共 32 条
Quality of life in heart failure patients undergoing hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation versus usual care-results of the Telerehabilitation in Heart Failure Patients (TELEREH-HF) Randomized Clinical Trial
被引:20
作者:
Piotrowicz, Ewa
[1
]
Mierzynska, Anna
[2
]
Banach, Maciej
[3
]
Jaworska, Izabela
[4
,5
,6
]
Pencina, Michal
[7
]
Kowalik, Ilona
[8
]
Pluta, Slawomir
[5
]
Szalewska, Dominika
[9
]
Opolski, Grzegorz
[10
,11
]
Zareba, Wojciech
[12
]
Glowczynska, Renata
[10
,11
]
Irzmanski, Robert
[13
]
Orzechowski, Piotr
[1
]
Kalarus, Zbigniew
[5
]
Piotrowicz, Ryszard
[2
,14
]
机构:
[1] Natl Inst Cardiol, Telecardiol Ctr, 42 Alpejska St, PL-04628 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Natl Inst Cardiol, Dept Coronary Artery Dis & Cardiac Rehabil, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Polish Mothers Mem Hosp Res Inst PMMHRI, Lodz, Poland
[4] Med Univ Silesia, Dept Cardiac Vasc & Endovasc Surg & Transplantol, Zabrze, Poland
[5] Silesian Ctr Heart Dis, Zabrze, Poland
[6] St Camillus Hosp, Palliat Med Dept, Tarnowskie Gory, Poland
[7] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[8] Natl Inst Cardiol, Warsaw, Poland
[9] Med Univ Gdansk, Dept Rehabil Med, Gdansk, Poland
[10] Med Univ Warsaw, Chair 1, Warsaw, Poland
[11] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Cardiol, Warsaw, Poland
[12] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[13] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Internal Med & Cardiac Rehabil, Lodz, Poland
[14] Warsaw Acad Med Rehabil, Warsaw, Poland
关键词:
quality of life;
hybrid telerehabilitation;
heart failure;
telemanagement;
HOME-BASED TELEREHABILITATION;
REHABILITATION;
ASSOCIATION;
STATEMENT;
ADHERENCE;
BARRIERS;
PEOPLE;
D O I:
10.5114/aoms.2020.98350
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) consisting of telecare (with psychological telesupport), telerehabilitation and remote monitoring of implantable devices might be an innovative option improving heart failure (HF) patients' quality of life (QoL) and emotional health. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of HCTR on various facets of QoL in HF patients in comparison with usual care (UC) alone. Material and methods: The present analysis formed part of a multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled 850 HF patients (NYHA I-III, LVEF <= 40%). Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to HCTR plus UC or UC only. Patients underwent either an HCTR program or UC with observation. The psychological intervention in the HCTR group included supportive psychological counseling via mobile phone. The Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 Questionnaire was used to assess QoL. Measurements were made before and after a 9-week intervention (HCTR group)/observation (UC group). Results: After the intervention, the HCTR group showed significant improvement in overall QoL, physical domain (PD) of QoL, and 4 areas of QoL (physical functioning (PhF), role functioning related to physical state (RF), general health (GH), vitality (VI)). A significant positive change in QoL in the UC group was observed only in VI and social functioning. There were also significant differences in QoL after 9-week intervention/observation between the two groups. The results showed greater improvement in HCTR for overall QoL (p = 0.009), PD of QoL (p = 0.0003) and three specific areas of QoL: PhF (p = 0.001), RF (p = 0.003), bodily pain (BP) (p = 0.015). Conclusions: In comparison to UC, HCTR resulted in improvement in overall QoL, PD of QoL and 3 specific areas of QoL: PhF, RF and BP.
引用
收藏
页码:1599 / 1612
页数:14
相关论文