The potential of legislation on organ donation to increase the supply of donor organs

被引:16
作者
Coppen, Remco [1 ]
Friele, Roland D. [1 ,2 ]
van der Zee, Jouke [3 ]
Gevers, Sjef K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, NIVEL, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Tranzo Sci Ctr Transformat Care & Welf, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Int Hlth, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Social Medicine, Hlth Law Sect, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Policy development; Legislation; Consent system; Fundamental principles; Organ donation; Organ shortage; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; PRESUMED CONSENT; MANDATED CHOICE; TRANSPLANTATION; ATTITUDES; DEFAULTS; POLICIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.019
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this paper is to assess the possibilities to adapt the 1998 Dutch Organ Donation Act, taking account of fundamental principles such as the right to physical integrity, equitable access to and equal availability of care, and the non-commerciality principle, with a view to increasing the organ supply. Methods: In 2008 the Dutch Taskforce on Organ Donation presented several proposals to amend the Act and to increase the supply of organs. This paper describes the proposals to amend the Act and evaluates them by assessing their intrinsic adherence to basic principles and the available evidence that these proposals will indeed increase the organ supply. Results: Several proposals could, constitute an infringement of fundamental principles of the Act. Moreover, evidence for their impact on the organ supply is lacking. Changing the consent system is possible, as this would not incur legal objections. There are diverging views regarding the impact of consent systems on the organ supply. Conclusions: The scope for changing the Act and its impact on organ procurement is at best limited. Relying on legislation alone will possibly not bring much relief, whereas additional policy measures may be more successful. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 170
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Gay, Sebastien .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 25 (04) :599-620
[2]  
ABBING HDCR, 1990, HEALTH POLICY, V16, P105
[3]  
AKVELD JEM, 1988, ORGAANDONATIE KWESTI
[4]   Financial incentives for cadaver organ donation: An ethical reappraisal [J].
Arnold, R ;
Bartlett, S ;
Bernat, J ;
Colonna, J ;
Dafoe, D ;
Dubler, N ;
Gruber, S ;
Kahn, J ;
Luskin, R ;
Nathan, H ;
Orloff, S ;
Prottas, J ;
Shapiro, R ;
Ricordi, C ;
Youngner, S ;
Delmonico, FL .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (08) :1361-1367
[5]  
CAPLAN A, 1991, INCREASING ORGAN TIS
[6]  
Caplan A., 2009, Trafficking in organs, tissues and cells and trafficking in human beings for the purpose of the removal of organs
[7]  
CHARRO FT, 1993, HLTH POLICY, V25, P199
[8]  
Childress JamesF., 2006, Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action
[9]   Modified mandated choice for organ procurement [J].
Chouhan, P ;
Draper, H .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2003, 29 (03) :157-162
[10]  
*COORD ORG, 2008, MAST ORG DON VRIJBL