Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:9
作者
Shia, Wei-Chung [1 ]
Yang, Hui-Ju [2 ]
Wu, Hwa-Koon [3 ]
Lin, Shih-Lung [4 ]
Lai, Hung-Wen [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Huang, Yu-Len [8 ]
Chen, Dar-Ren [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Changhua Christian Hosp, Canc Res Ctr, Changhua, Taiwan
[2] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Changhua, Taiwan
[3] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Changhua, Taiwan
[4] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Reconstruct Plast & Hand Surg, Changhua, Taiwan
[5] Changhua Christian Hosp, Endoscop & Oncoplast Breast Surg Ctr, Changhua, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Changhua Christian Hosp, Comprehens Breast Canc Ctr, 135 NanXiao St, Changhua 500, Taiwan
[8] Tunghai Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Direct-to-implant reconstruction;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.024
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an increasingly popular alternative to more traditional mastectomy approaches. However, estimating the implant volume during direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction following NSM is difficult for surgeons with little-to-moderate experience. We aimed to provide a fast, easy to use, and accurate method to aid in the estimation of implant size for DTI reconstruction using the specimen weight and breast volume. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from 145 NSM patients with specific implant types. Standard two-dimensional digital mammograms were obtained in 118 of the patients. Breastmorphological factors (specimen weight, mammographic breast density and volume, and implant size and type) were recorded. Curve-fitting and linear regression models were used to develop formulas predicting the implant volume, and the prediction performance of the obtained formulas was evaluated using the prospective data set. Results: Two formulas to estimate the implant size were obtained, one using the specimen weight and one using the breast volume. The coefficients of correlation (R-2) in these formulas were over 0.98 and the root mean squared errors were approximately 13. Conclusions: These implant volume estimate formulas benefit surgeons by providing a preoperative implant volume assessment in DTI reconstruction using the breast volume and an intraoperative assessment using the specimen weight. The implant size estimation formulas obtained in the present study may be applied in a majority of patients. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 296
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Local recurrence of mammary Paget’s disease after nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant breast reconstruction: a case report and literature review [J].
Qian Pu ;
Qianqian Zhao ;
Dezong Gao .
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 20
[42]   Breast cancer patients' postoperative outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement: a single center experience [J].
De Luca, Alessandro ;
Amabile, Maria Ida ;
Frusone, Federico ;
Tripodi, Domenico ;
Costanzo, Maria Ludovica ;
La Torre, Giuseppe ;
Marcasciano, Marco ;
Lo Torto, Federico ;
Monti, Massimo ;
Vergine, Massimo ;
Ribuffo, Diego .
GLAND SURGERY, 2024, 13 (07) :1164-1177
[43]   Robotic Versus Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction [J].
Houvenaeghel, Gilles ;
Barrou, Julien ;
Jauffret, Camille ;
Rua, Sandrine ;
Sabiani, Laura ;
Van Troy, Aurore ;
Buttarelli, Max ;
Blache, Guillaume ;
Lambaudie, Eric ;
Cohen, Monique ;
Bannier, Marie .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
[44]   Seldom one and done: Characterizing rates of reoperation with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after mastectomy [J].
Hammond, Jacob B. ;
Foley, Brittany M. ;
Kosiorek, Heidi E. ;
Cronin, Patricia A. ;
Rebecca, Alanna M. ;
Casey, William J., III ;
Kruger, Erwin A. ;
Teven, Chad M. ;
Pockaj, Barbara A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 224 (01) :141-146
[45]   Nipple-Areolar Complex Ischemia After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction: Risk Factors and the Success of Conservative Treatment [J].
Dent, Briar L. ;
Small, Kevin ;
Swistel, Alexander ;
Talmor, Mia .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2014, 34 (04) :560-570
[46]   Mastectomy flap necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction: An evaluation of tumescence and sharp dissection technique on surgical outcomes [J].
Ng, Troy ;
Knowles, Sarah ;
Brackstone, Muriel ;
Doherty, Chris .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (06) :1079-1083
[47]   Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Recurrence From Previous Breast Conservation Therapy [J].
Lee, Che-Hsiung ;
Cheng, Ming-Huei ;
Wu, Chih-Wei ;
Kuo, Wen-Ling ;
Yu, Chi-Chang ;
Huang, Jung-Ju .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 82 :S95-S102
[48]   Immediate Versus Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy [J].
Barnes, Laura L. ;
Patterson, Anne ;
Lem, Melinda ;
Holland, Michael C. ;
Lentz, Rachel ;
Sbitany, Hani ;
Piper, Merisa L. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (05) :432-436
[49]   Modified goldilocks nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant-based reconstruction: a case report [J].
Bovill, John D. ;
Deldar, Romina ;
Wang, Jessica ;
Greenwalt, Ian ;
Fan, Kenneth L. .
GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (05) :927-931
[50]   Staged Suprapectoral Expander/Implant Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy [J].
Salibian, Arthur H. ;
Harness, Jay K. ;
Mowlds, Donald S. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (01) :30-39