Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:9
作者
Shia, Wei-Chung [1 ]
Yang, Hui-Ju [2 ]
Wu, Hwa-Koon [3 ]
Lin, Shih-Lung [4 ]
Lai, Hung-Wen [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Huang, Yu-Len [8 ]
Chen, Dar-Ren [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Changhua Christian Hosp, Canc Res Ctr, Changhua, Taiwan
[2] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Changhua, Taiwan
[3] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Changhua, Taiwan
[4] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Reconstruct Plast & Hand Surg, Changhua, Taiwan
[5] Changhua Christian Hosp, Endoscop & Oncoplast Breast Surg Ctr, Changhua, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Changhua Christian Hosp, Comprehens Breast Canc Ctr, 135 NanXiao St, Changhua 500, Taiwan
[8] Tunghai Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Direct-to-implant reconstruction;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.024
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an increasingly popular alternative to more traditional mastectomy approaches. However, estimating the implant volume during direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction following NSM is difficult for surgeons with little-to-moderate experience. We aimed to provide a fast, easy to use, and accurate method to aid in the estimation of implant size for DTI reconstruction using the specimen weight and breast volume. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from 145 NSM patients with specific implant types. Standard two-dimensional digital mammograms were obtained in 118 of the patients. Breastmorphological factors (specimen weight, mammographic breast density and volume, and implant size and type) were recorded. Curve-fitting and linear regression models were used to develop formulas predicting the implant volume, and the prediction performance of the obtained formulas was evaluated using the prospective data set. Results: Two formulas to estimate the implant size were obtained, one using the specimen weight and one using the breast volume. The coefficients of correlation (R-2) in these formulas were over 0.98 and the root mean squared errors were approximately 13. Conclusions: These implant volume estimate formulas benefit surgeons by providing a preoperative implant volume assessment in DTI reconstruction using the breast volume and an intraoperative assessment using the specimen weight. The implant size estimation formulas obtained in the present study may be applied in a majority of patients. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 296
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique [J].
Uhi Toh ;
Miki Takenaka ;
Nobutaka Iwakuma ;
Yoshito Akagi .
Surgery Today, 2021, 51 :862-871
[22]   Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant Reconstruction: Cosmetic Outcomes and Technical Refinements [J].
Salgarello, Marzia ;
Visconti, Giuseppe ;
Barone-Adesi, Liliana .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 126 (05) :1460-1471
[23]   Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique [J].
Toh, Uhi ;
Takenaka, Miki ;
Iwakuma, Nobutaka ;
Akagi, Yoshito .
SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (06) :862-871
[24]   Nipple Malposition after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Implant-based Reconstruction: Understanding Its Occurrence and Prevention [J].
Shiraishi, Tomohiro ;
Suga, Hirotaka ;
Tsuji, Naoko ;
Harii, Kiyonori ;
Takushima, Akihiko .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 3 (02) :53-63
[25]   Long-term breast and nipple sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: Relevance to physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being [J].
Hammond, Jacob B. ;
Kandi, Lyndsay A. ;
Armstrong, Valerie L. ;
Kosiorek, Heidi E. ;
Rebecca, Alanna M. ;
Casey, William J., III ;
Kruger, Erwin A. ;
Cronin, Patricia A. ;
Pockaj, Barbara A. ;
Teven, Chad M. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (09) :2914-2919
[26]   Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Primary Implant Reconstruction: Surgical and Oncological Outcome of 435 Breast Cancer Patients [J].
Radovanovic, Zoran ;
Ranisavljevic, Milan ;
Radovanovic, Dragana ;
Vicko, Ferenc ;
Ivkovic-Kapicl, Tatjana ;
Solajic, Nenad .
BREAST CARE, 2018, 13 (05) :373-378
[27]   Comparative Study of Nipple–Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander–Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy [J].
Hyungsuk Kim ;
Sun-June Park ;
Kyong-Je Woo ;
Sa Ik Bang .
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2019, 43 :313-327
[28]   Symmetry of Nipple Position After Bilateral Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction The Impact of Reconstructive Method [J].
Mercury, Oblaise ;
Nores, Gabriella Garcia ;
Carlson, Grant W. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 88 (05) :S422-S426
[29]   Esthetic evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy [J].
Mori H. ;
Umeda T. ;
Osanai T. ;
Hata Y. .
Breast Cancer, 2005, 12 (4) :299-303
[30]   Improving Decision-making in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: The Key Role of Flap Thickness Ratio [J].
Pagliara, Domenico ;
Montella, Rino Aldo ;
Garganese, Giorgia ;
Bove, Sonia ;
Costantini, Melania ;
Rinaldi, Pierluigi Maria ;
Pino, Valentina ;
Grieco, Federica ;
Rubino, Corrado ;
Salgarello, Marzia .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2023, 23 (02) :E37-E44