Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of subsolid nodules: Evaluation of a commercial CAD system

被引:31
作者
Benzakoun, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Bommart, Sebastien [3 ,4 ]
Coste, Joel [1 ,2 ]
Chassagnon, Guillaume [2 ,5 ]
Lederlin, Mathieu [6 ,7 ]
Boussouar, Samia [2 ,8 ]
Revel, Marie-Pierre [5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Hotel Dieu, 1 Parvis Notre Dame, F-75004 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, 12 Rue Ecole Med, F-75006 Paris, France
[3] CHU Montpellier, 191 Ave Doyen Gaston Giraud, F-34000 Montpellier, France
[4] INSERM U 1046, 371 Ave Doyen G Giraud, F-34000 Montpellier, France
[5] Hop Cochin, Radiol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[6] CHU Rennes, Radiol, 2 Rue Henri Guilloux, F-35000 Rennes, France
[7] Univ Rennes 1, 9 Rue Jean Mace, F-35000 Rennes, France
[8] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, 20 Rue Leblanc, F-75015 Paris, France
关键词
Solitary pulmonary nodule; Computer-aided diagnosis; Lung neoplasm; Image interpretation; GROUND-GLASS OPACITY; SOLID LUNG NODULES; THIN-SECTION CT; PULMONARY NODULES; ASSISTED DETECTION; CANCER; TOMOGRAPHY; COMPONENT; IMAGES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.011
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a commercially available CAD system for automated detection and measurement of subsolid nodules. Materials and methods: The CAD system was tested on 50 pure ground-glass and 50 part-solid nodules (median diameter: 17 mm) previously found on standard-dose CT scans in 100 different patients. True nodule detection and the total number of CAD marks were evaluated at different sensitivity settings. The influence of nodule and CT acquisition characteristics was analyzed with logistic regression. Software and manually measured diameters were compared with Spearman and Bland-Altman methods. Results: With sensitivity adjusted for 3-mm nodule detection, 50/100 (50%) subsolid nodules were detected, at the average cost of 17 CAD marks per CT. These figures were respectively 26/100 (26%) and 2 at the 5-mm setting. At the highest sensitivity setting (2-mm nodule detection), the average number of CAD marks per CT was 41 but the nodule detection rate only increased to 54%. Part-solid nodules were better detected than pure ground glass nodules: 36/50 (72%) versus 14/50 (28%) at the 3-mm setting (p < 0.0001), with no influence of the solid component size. Except for the type (i.e. part solid or pure ground glass), no other nodule characteristic influenced the detection rate. High-quality segmentation was obtained for 79 nodules, which for automated measurements correlated well with manual measurements (rho = 0.90[0.84-0.93]). All part-solid nodules had software-measured attenuation values above - 671 Hounsfield units (HU). Conclusion: The detection rate of subsolid nodules by this CAD system was insufficient, but high-quality segmentation was obtained in 79% of cases, allowing automated measurement of size and attenuation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1728 / 1734
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   UK Lung Screen (UKLS) nodule management protocol: modelling of a single screen randomised controlled trial of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer [J].
Baldwin, D. R. ;
Duffy, S. W. ;
Wald, N. J. ;
Page, R. ;
Hansell, D. M. ;
Field, J. K. .
THORAX, 2011, 66 (04) :308-313
[3]   Evaluation of a computer aided detection system for lung nodules with ground glass opacity component on multidetector-row CT [J].
Beigelman-Aubry, C. ;
Hill, C. ;
Boulanger, X. ;
Brun, A. L. ;
Leclercq, D. ;
Golmard, J. L. ;
Grenier, P. A. ;
Lucidarme, O. .
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2009, 90 (12) :1843-1849
[4]   Satisfaction of Search from Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Computed Tomography of the Chest [J].
Berbaum, Kevin S. ;
Schartz, Kevin M. ;
Caldwell, Robert T. ;
Madsen, Mark T. ;
Thompson, Brad H. ;
Mullan, Brian F. ;
Ellingson, Andrew N. ;
Franken, Edmund A., Jr. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (02) :194-201
[5]   Lung cancer screening with CT: Evaluation of radiologists and different computer assisted detection software (CAD) as first and second readers for lung nodule detection at different dose levels [J].
Christe, A. ;
Leidolt, L. ;
Huber, A. ;
Steiger, P. ;
Szucs-Farkas, Z. ;
Roos, J. E. ;
Heverhagen, J. T. ;
Ebner, L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (12) :E873-E878
[6]   Small pulmonary nodules:: Effect of two computer-aided detection systems on radiologist performance [J].
Das, Marco ;
Muehlenbruch, Georg ;
Mahnken, Andreas H. ;
Flohr, Thomas G. ;
Guendel, Lutz ;
Stanzel, Sven ;
Kraus, Thomas ;
Guenther, Rolf W. ;
Wildberger, Joachim E. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :564-571
[7]   A comparison of six software packages for evaluation of solid lung nodules using semi-automated volumetry: What is the minimum increase in size to detect growth in repeated CT examinations [J].
de Hoop, Bartjan ;
Gietema, Hester ;
van Ginneken, Bram ;
Zanen, Pieter ;
Groenewegen, Gerard ;
Prokop, Mathias .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (04) :800-808
[8]   Detection sensitivity of a commercial lung nodule CAD system in a series of pathologically proven lung cancers [J].
Godoy, Myrna C. B. ;
Cooperberg, Peter L. ;
Maizlin, Zeev V. ;
Yuan, Ren ;
McWilliams, Annette ;
Lam, Stephen ;
Mayo, John R. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2008, 23 (01) :1-6
[9]   Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection Analysis for the Detection of Subsolid and Solid Lung Nodules on Thin- and Thick-Section CT [J].
Godoy, Myrna C. B. ;
Kim, Tae Jung ;
White, Charles S. ;
Bogoni, Luca ;
de Groot, Patricia ;
Florin, Charles ;
Obuchowski, Nancy ;
Babb, James S. ;
Salganicoff, Marcos ;
Naidich, David P. ;
Anand, Vikram ;
Park, Sangmin ;
Vlahos, Ioannis ;
Ko, Jane P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (01) :74-83
[10]   CT screening for lung cancer: Frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules [J].
Henschke, CI ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Mirtcheva, R ;
McGuinness, G ;
McCauley, D ;
Miettinen, OS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (05) :1053-1057