Vigilance and grouping in the southern African ground squirrel (Xerus inauris)

被引:22
作者
Edwards, Sarah
Waterman, Jane M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Biol Sci, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Biol Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Cape ground squirrels; foraging-vigilance trade-off; grouping; vigilance; DEGUS OCTODON-DEGUS; GROUP-SIZE; COLLECTIVE VIGILANCE; ANTIPREDATOR VIGILANCE; PREDATION RISK; BEHAVIOR; INCREASES; SCIURIDAE; PATTERNS; RODENTIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2028.2011.01262.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Animals may form groups in response to the foraging-vigilance trade-off, through enhanced predator detection (collective detection hypothesis) or reduced predation risk to the individual (dilution hypothesis), allowing individuals to decrease vigilance levels. Both hypotheses predict decreasing individual vigilance levels with increasing group size; however, the collective detection hypothesis also predicts increasing overall group vigilance with increasing group size. However, in species in which vigilance and foraging are not mutually exclusive, where vigilance may not be as costly, neither of these hypotheses may apply. Here, we examine the relationship between group size and vigilance in the social Cape ground squirrel (Xerus inauris), a species that can combine foraging and vigilance behaviours. Ten groups were observed using scan sampling, measuring both group and individual vigilance and group size. A negative relationship existed between individual vigilance and group size and a positive relationship between group vigilance and group size. Therefore, in Cape ground squirrels, vigilance seems to be costly even though it can be combined with foraging behaviours. Furthermore, group vigilance behaviour gives support to the collective detection hypothesis, whilst individual vigilance gives support to both hypotheses.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 291
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF BEHAVIOR - SAMPLING METHODS [J].
ALTMANN, J .
BEHAVIOUR, 1974, 49 (3-4) :227-267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Biostatistical Analysis
[3]   Disentangling risk dilution and collective detection in the antipredator vigilance of semipalmated sandpipers in flocks [J].
Beauchamp, Guy ;
Ruxton, Graeme D. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 75 :1837-1842
[4]   Testing for peripheral vigilance: do birds value what they see when not overtly vigilant? [J].
Bednekoff, PA ;
Lima, SL .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2005, 69 :1165-1171
[5]   Why are scanning patterns so variable? An overlooked question in the study of anti-predator vigilance [J].
Bednekoff, PA ;
Lima, SL .
JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, 2002, 33 (02) :143-149
[6]   VIGILANCE AND GROUP-SIZE IN OSTRICHES [J].
BERTRAM, BCR .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1980, 28 (FEB) :278-286
[7]   Induced or routine vigilance while foraging [J].
Blanchard, Pierrick ;
Fritz, Herve .
OIKOS, 2007, 116 (10) :1603-1608
[8]   Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? [J].
Childress, MJ ;
Lung, MA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 66 :389-398
[9]   Vigilance and collective detection of predators in degus (Octodon degus) [J].
Ebensperger, Luis A. ;
Hurtado, Maria A. Jose ;
Ramos-Jiliberto, Rodrigo .
ETHOLOGY, 2006, 112 (09) :879-887