Tensile bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces

被引:80
作者
Kocadereli, I
Canay, S
Akça, K
机构
[1] Univ Hacettepe, Fac Dent, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Hacettepe, Dept Orthodont, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Univ Hacettepe, Dept Prosthodont, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mod.2001.113655
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare various surface treatment methods to define the procedure that produces adequate bond strength between ceramic brackets and porcelain. The specimens used in this study, 60 porcelain tabs, were produced by duplication of the labial surface of a maxillary first premolar. The 6 different preparation procedures tested were: (1) sandblasting with 50 mum aluminum oxide in a sandblasting device, (2) application of silane to the porcelain and the bracket base, (3) sandblasting followed by application of silane, (4) acid etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid, (5) acid etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid followed by application of silane, and (6) sandblasting followed by application of 4-Meta adhesive. The ceramic brackets were bonded with no-mix orthodontic bonding material. A bonding force testing machine was used to determine tensile bond strengths at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm per second. The results of the study showed that porcelain surface preparation with acid etching followed by silane application resulted in a statistically significant higher tensile bond strength (P <.05). Sandblasting the porcelain surface before silane treatment provided similar bond strengths, but sandblasting or acid etching alone were less effective. Silane application was recommended to bond a ceramic bracket to the porcelain surface to achieve bond strengths that are clinically acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 620
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   BONDING AND DEBONDING BRACKETS TO PORCELAIN AND GOLD [J].
ANDREASEN, GF ;
STIEG, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 93 (04) :341-345
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, SKINNERS SCI DENT MA
[3]  
BAHRAM GT, 1979, AM J ORTHOD, V76, P80
[4]   DIRECT BONDING TO PORCELAIN [J].
BARBOSA, VLT ;
ALMEIDA, MA ;
CHEVITARESE, O ;
KEITH, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 107 (02) :159-164
[5]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE DEBONDING STRENGTHS OF DIFFERENT CERAMIC BRACKETS, ENAMEL CONDITIONERS, AND ADHESIVES [J].
BISHARA, SE ;
FEHR, DE ;
JAKOBSEN, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1993, 104 (02) :170-179
[6]   TENSILE STRENGTH AND MODULUS OF ELASTICITY OF TOOTH STRUCTURE AND SEVERAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS [J].
BOWEN, RL ;
RODRIGUEZ, MS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1962, 64 (03) :378-&
[7]   The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets [J].
Canay, S ;
Kocadereli, I ;
Akça, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 117 (01) :15-19
[8]   COMPARATIVE TENSILE STRENGTHS OF BRACKETS BONDED TO PORCELAIN WITH ORTHODONTIC ADHESIVE AND PORCELAIN REPAIR SYSTEMS [J].
EUSTAQUIO, R ;
GARNER, LD ;
MOORE, BK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 94 (05) :421-425
[9]   EFFECTIVENESS OF PORCELAIN REPAIR SYSTEMS [J].
HIGHTON, RM ;
CAPUTO, AA ;
MATYAS, J .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1979, 42 (03) :292-294
[10]   DIRECT BONDING OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS TO PORCELAIN VENEER LAMINATES [J].
KAO, EC ;
BOLTZ, KC ;
JOHNSTON, WM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 94 (06) :458-468