Marine Sites and the Drivers of Wellbeing: Ecosystem vs. Anthropic Services

被引:4
作者
Cavalletti, Barbara [1 ]
Corsi, Matteo [1 ]
Lagomarsino, Elena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Econ, I-16126 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management Marco Fanno CRIEP, I-35123 Padua, Italy
关键词
marine and coastal ecosystems; discrete choice experiments; ecosystem services; conditional logit; mixed logit; latent class logit; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENT; LOGIT-MODELS; BENEFITS; VALUATION; DESIGN; VALUES; PARK;
D O I
10.3390/su132212568
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coastal sites offer a range of services that contribute to human wellbeing. While some of the services are entirely human-made (e.g., parasol and sunbed rental), others are produced thanks to the contribution of marine ecosystems (e.g., water clarity). The purpose of this paper is to investigate the preferences of a sample of beachgoers for these two categories of services that policymakers have to balance when designing management strategies for coastal sites. We consider a marine site in the north of Italy that partially falls within the boundaries of a protected area but that is characterized by a medium-to-high level of anthropization. The results of a discrete choice experiment show that in the current state of things, the ecosystem services proposed for the sample have, on average, a higher marginal utility, suggesting that actions increasing those services have a larger effect on well-being.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   COMBINING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL AMENITIES [J].
ADAMOWICZ, W ;
LOUVIERE, J ;
WILLIAMS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 26 (03) :271-292
[2]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[3]   Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergies [J].
Ament, Judith M. ;
Moore, Christine A. ;
Herbst, Marna ;
Cumming, Graeme S. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04) :440-450
[4]   Evaluating management options for a Marine and Terrestrial National Park: Heterogeneous preferences in choice experiments [J].
Barrio, Melina ;
Loureiro, Maria L. .
MARINE POLICY, 2018, 95 :85-94
[5]  
Barton D.N., 2019, EXP M ADV MEAS EC SE
[6]   Valuing conservation benefits of an offshore marine protected area [J].
Boerger, Tobias ;
Hattam, Caroline ;
Burdon, Daryl ;
Atkins, Jonathan P. ;
Austen, Melanie C. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 108 :229-241
[7]   What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units [J].
Boyd, James ;
Banzhaf, Spencer .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) :616-626
[8]   A social-ecological impact assessment for public lands management: application of a conceptual and methodological framework [J].
Brymer, Amanda L. Bentley ;
Holbrook, Joseph D. ;
Niemeyer, Ryan J. ;
Suazo, Alexis A. ;
Wulfhorst, J. D. ;
Vierling, Kerri T. ;
Newingham, Beth A. ;
Link, Timothy E. ;
Rachlow, Janet L. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (03)
[9]   Informing management strategies for a reserve: Results from a discrete choice experiment survey [J].
Bui Bich Xuan ;
Sandorf, Erlend Dancke ;
Aanesen, Margrethe .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 145 :35-43
[10]   Advancing Marine Policy Toward Ecosystem-Based Management by Eliciting Public Preferences [J].
Chhun, Sophal ;
Kahui, Viktoria ;
Moller, Henrik ;
Thorsnes, Paul .
MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 30 (03) :261-275