Dynamic Between-Leg Differences While Walking in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Patients With and Without Medial Meniscal Posterior Horn Tears

Background: Patients with anterior cruciate ligament-deficient (ACLD) knees with medial meniscal posterior horn tears (MMPHTs) have been reported to demonstrate a combined stiffening and pivot-shift gait pattern compared with healthy controls. Movement asymmetries are implicated in the development and progression of osteoarthritis. Purpose: To investigate the knee kinematics and kinetic asymmetries in ACLD patients with (ACLD + MMPHT group) and without (ACLD group) MMPHTs while walking on level ground. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 15 patients with isolated unilateral ACL ruptures, 10 with unilateral ACL ruptures and MMPHTs, and 22 healthy controls underwent gait testing between January 2014 and December 2016. Between-leg differences (BLDs) in knee kinematics and kinetics were compared among participants in all groups. Results: The ACLD + MMPHT group demonstrated significantly greater BLDs in knee moments in the sagittal plane during the loading response phase than the ACLD and control groups. Compared with the control group, the ACLD and ACLD + MMPHT groups demonstrated significantly greater BLDs in knee angles in the sagittal plane during the midstance and terminal stance phases. Compared with the control group, significantly greater BLDs in knee rotation moments were found throughout the stance phase in both the ACLD and the ACLD + MMPHT groups. BLDs in lateral ground-reaction forces (GRFs) in the ACLD + MMPHT and ACLD groups were both significantly greater than the control group during the loading response phase. BLDs in anterior GRFs in the ACLD + MMPHT and ACLD groups were both significantly greater than the control group during the loading response phase. Only the ACLD + MMPHT group demonstrated greater BLDs in vertical GRFs than the control group during the loading response phase, while no significant differences were observed between the ACLD and control groups. Conclusion: The ACLD + MMPHT group demonstrated significantly more knee flexion moment asymmetries than the ACLD and control groups during the loading response phase. Both the ACLD + MMPHT and the ACLD groups demonstrated significant knee angle and moment asymmetries in the sagittal plane during the terminal stance phase than the control group. Both the ACLD + MMPHT and the ACLD groups demonstrated knee rotation moment asymmetries during the midstance and terminal stance phases compared with the control group. A rehabilitation program for ACLD patients both with and without MMPHTs should take into consideration these asymmetric gait patterns.