The use of tumour volumetrics to assess response to therapy in anticancer clinical trials

被引:40
作者
Goldmacher, Gregory V. [1 ]
Conklin, James [1 ]
机构
[1] ICON Med Imaging, Med & Sci Affairs, Warrington, PA 18976 USA
关键词
cancer imaging; clinical trials; imaging biomarkers; quantitative imaging; tumour volume; volumetry; INTRAOBSERVER VARIABILITY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IMATINIB MESYLATE; CT; CRITERIA; CANCER; RECIST; INTEROBSERVER; SIZE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04179.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Serial evaluations of tumour burden using imaging, mainly computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, form the basis for assessing treatment response in many clinical trials of anticancer therapeutics. Traditionally, these evaluations have been based on linear measurements of tumour size. Such measurements have limitations related to variability in technical factors, tumour morphology and reader decisions. Measurements of entire tumour volumes may overcome some of the limitations of linear tumour measurements, improving our ability to detect small changes reliably and increasing statistical power per subject in a trial. Certain technical factors are known to affect the accuracy and precision of volume measurements, and work is in progress to define these factors more thoroughly and to qualify tumour volume as a biomarker for the purposes of drug development.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 854
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1979, HDB REP RES CANC TRE
  • [2] Tumour size measurement in an oncology clinical trial: Comparison between off-site and on-site measurements
    Belton, AL
    Saini, S
    Liebermann, K
    Boland, GW
    Halpern, EF
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (04) : 311 - 314
  • [3] We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST
    Benjamin, Robert S.
    Choi, Haesun
    Macapinlac, Homer A.
    Burgess, Michael A.
    Patel, Shreyaskumar R.
    Chen, Lei L.
    Podoloff, Donald A.
    Charnsangavej, Chuslip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (13) : 1760 - 1764
  • [4] Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods
    Bogot, NR
    Kazerooni, EA
    Kelly, AM
    Quint, LE
    Desjardins, B
    Nan, B
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (08) : 948 - 956
  • [5] Borradaile K, 2010, APPL CLIN TRIALS, V19, P40
  • [6] Volumetric CT in Lung Cancer: An Example for the Qualification of Imaging as a Biomarker
    Buckler, Andrew J.
    Mozley, P. David
    Schwartz, Lawrence
    Petrick, Nicholas
    McNitt-Gray, Michael
    Fenimore, Charles
    O'Donnell, Kevin
    Hayes, Wendy
    Kim, Hyun J.
    Clarke, Laurence
    Sullivan, Daniel
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2010, 17 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [7] Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Buyse, M
    Thirion, P
    Carlson, RW
    Burzykowski, T
    Molenberghs, G
    Piedbois, P
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) : 373 - 378
  • [8] Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma
    Cheson, Bruce D.
    Pfistner, Beate
    Juweid, Malik E.
    Gascoyne, Randy D.
    Specht, Lena
    Horning, Sandra J.
    Coiffier, Bertrand
    Fisher, Richard I.
    Hagenbeek, Anton
    Zucca, Emanuele
    Rosen, Steven T.
    Stroobants, Sigrid
    Lister, T. Andrew
    Hoppe, Richard T.
    Dreyling, Martin
    Tobinai, Kensei
    Vose, Julie M.
    Connors, Joseph M.
    Federico, Massimo
    Diehl, Volker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (05) : 579 - 586
  • [9] CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: A quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings
    Choi, H
    Charnsangavej, C
    Faria, SD
    Tamm, EP
    Benjamin, RS
    Johnson, MM
    Macapinlac, HA
    Podoloff, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (06) : 1619 - 1628
  • [10] Response evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Choi, Haesun
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2008, 13 : 4 - 7