Waste Sites and Property Values: A Meta-Analysis

被引:29
作者
Braden, John B. [1 ]
Feng, Xia [2 ]
Won, DooHwan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Coll William & Mary, Off Inst Anal & Effectiveness, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
[3] Sungshin Womens Univ, Dept Econ, Seoul 136742, South Korea
关键词
Meta analysis; Hedonic method; Property values; Waste sites; NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANTS; SUPERFUND SITES; ECONOMIC-BENEFITS; HOUSING-MARKET; AREA; IMPACTS; PRICES; INCINERATOR; TEMPORARY; LANDFILLS;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-011-9467-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recent studies suggest that some of the most contaminated waste sites in the United States have idiosyncratic or no discernable effects on nearby property values. This paper presents a meta-analysis of the literature measuring the economic impact of sites harboring waste materials on real estate values. A sample of 46 North American studies issued from 1971 to 2008 yields 129 distinct estimates that survive outlier diagnostics. The estimation results are highly robust and significant across estimators and specifications. They suggest that all classes of waste sites affect real estate prices, but sites classified as hazardous, especially aquatic hazardous sites, are associated with the greatest discounts. The estimated impacts of nonhazardous waste and nuclear sites are not statistically different from one another. Surprisingly, estimated impacts associated with sites included on the EPA's National Priority List (NPL) are generally smaller (although still statistically significant) than those for non-NPL hazardous waste sites. The estimates for sites in Canada and Mountain, Middle Atlantic, and South Atlantic states exceed those for other regions. Larger impact areas and aggregated data, such as census block observations, are associated with lesser estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 201
页数:27
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Adler K.J., 1982, BENEFITS REGULATING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, Educational Researcher, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X005010003, DOI 10.2307/1174772, 10.3102/0013189x005010003, 10.2307/1174772ISSN0536-1036]
[3]   Property values in a low populated area when dual noxious facilities are present [J].
Anstine, J .
GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2003, 34 (03) :345-358
[4]  
Belsley D.A., 2005, REGRESSION DIAGNOSTI
[5]  
Bleich Donald H., 1991, APPRAISAL J, V59, P247
[6]  
Bouvier RA., 2000, Journal of Regional Analysis Policy, V30, P23, DOI [10.22004/ag.econ.132172, DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.132172]
[7]   WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT GROUNDWATER VALUES - PRELIMINARY IMPLICATIONS FROM A METAANALYSIS OF CONTINGENT-VALUATION STUDIES [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
POE, GL ;
BERGSTROM, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 76 (05) :1055-1061
[8]  
Boyle M.A., 2001, J REAL ESTATE LIT, V9, P117, DOI 10.1080/10835547.2001.12090098
[9]   Contaminant cleanup in the Waukegan Harbor area of concern: Homeowner attitudes and economic benefits [J].
Braden, JB ;
Patunru, AA ;
Chattopadhyay, S ;
Mays, N .
JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2004, 30 (04) :474-491
[10]  
Braden JB, 2010, DEP AGR CONS EC