Public policy modeling of distributed energy technologies: strategies, attributes, and challenges

被引:19
作者
Bruckner, T [1 ]
Morrison, R [1 ]
Wittmann, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.032
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The systems which provide active and passive energy-services are undergoing rapid institutional, commercial, and technical change. As part of this transformation, distributed energy technologies are expected to play a greater role. In addition, governments and local authorities are seeking to encourage selected distributed technologies, including wind power and cogeneration, for reasons of public interest. Even so, most energy sector policy support models have difficulty realizing distributed technologies, particularly where complex component/system interactions arise. High-resolution modeling addresses these shortcomings through increased topological resolution, greater temporal disaggregation, extended model scope, and support for context-dependent component performance. Examples using the deeco (dynamic energy, emissions, and cost optimization) energy system modeling environment are given. Multi-agent simulation and high-resolution modeling have similar underlying architectures and can be combined to yield entity-oriented modeling. This new technique additionally supports decentralized decision-making, automatically captures interacting commercial and technical dynamics, and may be used to investigate structural evolution. A summary of national energy policy modeling strategies and a roadmap are provided. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 345
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[31]   BEYOND-THE-HORIZON - RECENT DIRECTIONS IN LONG-TERM ENERGY MODELING [J].
KYDES, AS ;
SHAW, SH ;
MCDONALD, DF .
ENERGY, 1995, 20 (02) :131-149
[32]  
KYPREOS S, 1996, 9614 PSI DEP GEN EN
[33]   Minimization of diffuse scattering reduces resistivity of thin copper films [J].
Lind, C .
MRS BULLETIN, 2000, 25 (09) :7-7
[34]   Modernization of local energy systems [J].
Lindenberger, D ;
Bruckner, T ;
Morrison, R ;
Groscurth, HM ;
Kümmel, R .
ENERGY, 2004, 29 (02) :245-256
[35]   Technological change in economic models of environmental policy:: a survey [J].
Löschel, A .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 43 (2-3) :105-126
[36]  
MARKEWITZ P, 1998, SCHRIFTEN FORSCHUNGS
[37]  
Metz B., CLIMATE CHANGE 2001
[38]   NEMS and MARKAL-MACRO models for energy-environmental-economic analysis: A comparison of the electricity and carbon reduction projections [J].
Morris, SC ;
Goldstein, GA ;
Fthenakis, VM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2002, 7 (03) :207-216
[39]  
MORRISON R, 2000, THESIS U OTAGO DUNED
[40]  
MORRISON R, 2002, P 3 INT WORKSH ADV E, P97