共 51 条
Efficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial
被引:27
作者:
El Taha, Lina
[1
,2
]
Abu Musa, Antoine
[1
,2
]
Khalifeh, Dalia
[1
,2
]
Khalil, Ali
[1
,3
]
Abbasi, Sehrish
[1
]
Nassif, Joseph
[1
,4
,5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, POB 11-0236, Beirut 11072020, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Amer Univ Beirut, Div Gynecol Oncol, Med Ctr, Beirut, Lebanon
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Div Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, Houston, TX USA
[6] Texas Childrens Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词:
Endometriosis;
Pelvic pain;
Dysmenorrhoea;
Dienogest;
Combined oral contraceptives;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
LEUPROLIDE ACETATE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
MANAGEMENT;
MULTICENTER;
WOMEN;
SYMPTOMS;
THERAPY;
DYSMENORRHEA;
PATHOGENESIS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.029
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Objective: To compare the efficacy of dienogest with the combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) Yasmin for the control of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Study design: Seventy women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea or both for >6 months were randomized to either dienogest (Visanne) 2 mg/day or monophasic COC (Yasmin, 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone) for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was change in non-cyclic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea from baseline to end of treatment, assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary efficacy variable was change in the Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) scale scores for chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire at baseline and 24 weeks. Safety variables included incidence of side-effects, bleeding pattern and treatment tolerability. Results: Both treatments improved the mean VAS score for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain significantly: mean difference 6.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-7.1; p < 0.0001] in the dienogest group and 4.54 (95% CI 3.1-5.9; p < 0.0001) in the COC group; the difference between them was not significant (p = 0.111). Similarly, both dienogest and COC improved HRQoL in various core and modular segments of the EHP-30 questionnaire with comparable requirements for supplemental pain medication (p = 0.782 and 0.258 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively), and redistribution of the B&B severity profile for chronic pelvic pain (p = 0.052 and 0.526 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively), dysmenorrhoea (p = 0.521 and 1 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively) and dyspareunia (p = 0.376 and 0.835, respectively). Nevertheless, dienogest was associated with fewer side-effects, and hence had a better safety and tolerability profile than COC. Conclusions: Dienogest (2 mg/day) is comparable to the COC Yasmin for the relief of endometriosisassociated pelvic pain and improvement in HRQoL. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 212
页数:8
相关论文