US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities

被引:298
作者
Jenkins, Clinton N. [1 ]
Van Houtan, Kyle S. [2 ]
Pimm, Stuart L. [3 ]
Sexton, Joseph O. [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Pesquisas Ecol, BR-12960000 Nazare Paulista, SP, Brazil
[2] Natl Ocean & Atmospher Adm, Pacific Islands Fisheries Sci Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96818 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, Global Land Cover Facil, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
conservation priorities; protected areas; endemism; range size; extinction; CONSERVATION; AREAS; REPRESENTATION; EXTINCTION; PATTERNS; HOTSPOTS; RANGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1418034112
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Because habitat loss is the main cause of extinction, where and how much society chooses to protect is vital for saving species. The United States is well positioned economically and politically to pursue habitat conservation should it be a societal goal. We assessed the US protected area portfolio with respect to biodiversity in the country. New synthesis maps for terrestrial vertebrates, freshwater fish, and trees permit comparison with protected areas to identify priorities for future conservation investment. Although the total area protected is substantial, its geographic configuration is nearly the opposite of patterns of endemism within the country. Most protected lands are in the West, whereas the vulnerable species are largely in the Southeast. Private land protections are significant, but they are not concentrated where the priorities are. To adequately protect the nation's unique biodiversity, we recommend specific areas deserving additional protection, some of them including public lands, but many others requiring private investment.
引用
收藏
页码:5081 / 5086
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Mapping and exploring the distribution of the Vulnerable grey-winged cotinga Tijuca condita
    Alves, Maria Alice S.
    Pimm, Stuarr L.
    Storni, Alline
    Raposo, Marco A.
    Brooke, M. de L.
    Harris, Grant
    Foster, Andy
    Jenkins, Clinton N.
    [J]. ORYX, 2008, 42 (04) : 562 - 566
  • [2] [Anonymous], BIRD SPEC DISTR MAPS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, NATL CONSERVATION EA
  • [4] [Anonymous], PROT AR DAT US PADUS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, Digital distribution maps of the freshwater fishes in the conterminous United States. Version 3.0
  • [6] The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    Lobo, Jorge M.
    Moreno, Juan C.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) : 1423 - 1432
  • [7] Representation of Ecological Systems within the Protected Areas Network of the Continental United States
    Aycrigg, Jocelyn L.
    Davidson, Anne
    Svancara, Leona K.
    Gergely, Kevin J.
    McKerrow, Alexa
    Scott, J. Michael
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [8] Species, data, and conservation planning
    Brooks, T
    da Fonseca, GAB
    Rodrigues, ASL
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (06) : 1682 - 1688
  • [9] Global mammal conservation:: What must we manage?
    Ceballos, G
    Ehrlich, PR
    Soberón, J
    Salazar, I
    Fay, JP
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5734) : 603 - 607
  • [10] The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness
    Colwell, RK
    Lees, DC
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (02) : 70 - 76