A Comparative Study on the Export Competitiveness of Rare Earth Products from China, the United States, Russia and India

被引:2
|
作者
Guo, Qing [1 ]
Mai, Zishan [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Econ & Trade, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
关键词
rare earths; CMS model; WRCA index; export competitiveness; INDUSTRY; PROSPECTS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.3390/su141912358
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates and compares the export competitiveness of rare-earth products from China, the US, Russia, and India between 2006 and 2020 using the CMS model and the WRCA index. The results show that (1) the competitiveness of the four countries' rare-earth products has changed differently. The overall competitiveness of rare-earth products of China, the US, and India has decreased, whereas the competitiveness of Russia's rare-earth products has increased. (2) The factors inhibiting the development of the competitiveness of rare-earth products in the four countries are different. In China and India they are market factors and product factors, in the US it is the overall market share factor, and in Russia it is the market factor. (3) The competitiveness of rare-earth products varies greatly among the four countries. China has the highest rare-earth export competitiveness, whereas the US has significantly lower export competitiveness of rare-earth products than China. Russia and India do not have comparative advantages. (4) The four countries have different trends in the evolution of the competitiveness of rare-earth products. The export competitiveness of rare-earth products of China and India tends to decline, whereas that of the United States and Russia tends to rise. Based on the above findings, the paper puts forward corresponding policy recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] ANALYSIS ON THE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS OF CHINA'S FRUIT PRODUCTS
    Chen, Jun
    Chen, Chao
    Yao, Dilin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSFORMATIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN MANAGEMENT (ICTIM 2017), 2017, 37 : 359 - 369
  • [2] Renewable energy product competitiveness: Evidence from the United States, China and India
    Shuai, Jing
    Zhao, Yujia
    Wang, Yilan
    Cheng, Jinhua
    ENERGY, 2022, 249
  • [3] Reducing the United States? risks of dependency on China in the rare earth market
    Lee, Yurim
    Dacass, Tennecia
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 77
  • [4] Dynamics of export competitiveness of India and China: a study of HS 6-digit manufacturing exports
    Ganai, Sayed Gulzar
    Khan, Javid Ahmad
    Bhat, Showkat Ahmad
    COMPETITIVENESS REVIEW, 2023, 33 (05) : 889 - 938
  • [5] A comparative study of the status of GSHP applications in the United States and China
    Liu, Xiaobing
    Lu, Shilei
    Hughes, Patrick
    Cai, Zhe
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 48 : 558 - 570
  • [6] A dynamic evaluation on the international competitiveness of China's rare earth products: An industrial chain and tech-innovation perspective
    Shuai, Jing
    Peng, Xinjie
    Zhao, Yujia
    Wang, Yilan
    Xu, Wei
    Cheng, Jinhua
    Lu, Yang
    Wang, Jingjin
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 75
  • [7] Factors and competitiveness analysis in rare earth mining, new methodology: case study from Brazil
    Silva, Gustavo A.
    Petter, Carlos O.
    Albuquerque, Nelson R.
    HELIYON, 2018, 4 (03):
  • [8] Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions from economic growth: A comparative study of China and the United States
    Wang, Qiang
    Zhao, Mingming
    Li, Rongrong
    Su, Min
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 178 - 184
  • [9] Energy consumption in the transportation sectors in China and the United States: A longitudinal comparative study
    Wu, Ya
    Zhu, Qianwen
    Zhong, Ling
    Zhang, Tao
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2019, 51 : 349 - 360
  • [10] Comparative Study of Activity-Based Construction Labor Productivity in the United States and China
    Shen, Zhigang
    Jensen, Wayne
    Berryman, Charles
    Zhu, Yimin
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2011, 27 (02) : 116 - 124