Developers change software programs for various purposes (e.g., bug fixes, feature additions, and code refactorings), but the intents of code changes are often not recorded or are poorly documented. To automatically infer the change intent of each program commit (i.e., a set of code changes), existing work classifies commits based on commit messages and/or the sheer counts of edited files, lines, or abstract syntax tree (AST) nodes. However, none of these tools reason about the syntactic or semantic dependencies between co-applied changes, neither do they adopt any deep learning method. To better characterize program commits, in this paper, we present CClassifier-a new approach that classifies commits by (1) using advanced static program analysis to comprehend relationship between co-applied edits, (2) representing edits and their relationship via graphs, and (3) applying convolutional neural networks (CNN) to classify those graphs. Compared with prior work, CClassifier extracts a richer set of features from program changes; it is the first to classify program commits using CNN. For evaluation, we prepared a benchmark that contains 7,414 code changes from 5 open-source Java projects. On this benchmark, we empirically compared CClassifier and the state-of-the-art approach with five-fold cross validation. On average, when predicting bug-fixing commits within the same projects, CClassifier improved the prediction accuracy from 70% to 72%. More importantly, prior work seldom identifies feature-addition commits; CClassifier can successfully identify such commits in a lot more scenarios. Our evaluation shows that CClassifier outperforms prior work due to its usage of advanced program analysis and CNN.
