Individual differences in implicit attention to phonetic detail in speech perception

被引:0
|
作者
Lewandowski, Natalie [1 ]
Duran, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Ludwigs Univ Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
来源
INTERSPEECH 2019 | 2019年
关键词
speech perception; gamification; attention; personality; INHIBITORY SKILL; INTERFERENCE; PERSONALITY; DISPLAY;
D O I
10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2989
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
We present a study on the interactions between implicit attention to acoustic-phonetic detail in speech and individual differences (IDs). Attention to phonetic detail was assessed with acoustically manipulated speech stimuli within a computer game, an alternative to regular highly-controlled categorization tests. Twenty-two native German speakers (11f) completed the game and further tests including individual attention test measures (e.g. Simon Test), the BFI-10 (short version of the Big Five Inventory), and a Self-monitoring Test (need for social approval). With this study, we contribute to the understanding of the processes underlying human speech perception and the impact of cognitive and personality features on the attention to phonetic detail. Our results show that the general (non-verbal) attention capacity (mental flexibility, inhibition), interacts with implicit attention to phonetic detail. Furthermore, IDs in personality, such as sensitivity to social cues or conscientiousness significantly add to the effects. Understanding these interactions, especially arising in an intuitive and non-explicit study design, is an important step on the way towards explaining not only the influence of IDs on attention to phonetic detail, but also the dynamics of speech interaction (e.g. phonetic convergence).
引用
收藏
页码:2255 / 2259
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring Individual Differences in Native Phonetic Perception and Their Link to Nonnative Phonetic Perception
    Honda, Claire T.
    Clayards, Meghan
    Baum, Shari R.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2024, 50 (04) : 370 - 394
  • [2] Individual Differences in the Use of Acoustic-Phonetic Versus Lexical Cues for Speech Perception
    Giovannone, Nikole
    Theodore, Rachel M.
    FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2021, 6
  • [3] Infants use phonetic detail in speech perception and word learning when detail is easy to perceive
    Escudero, Paola
    Kalashnikova, Marina
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 190
  • [4] Social Priming of Speech Perception: The Role of Individual Differences in Implicit Racial and Ethnic Associations
    McLaughlin, Drew J.
    Van Engen, Kristin J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2024, 50 (04) : 329 - 357
  • [5] Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales
    Munson, Benjamin
    Schellinger, Sarah K.
    Edwards, Jan
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2017, 31 (01) : 56 - 79
  • [6] Individual differences in the link between perception and production and the mechanisms of phonetic imitation
    Kim, Donghyun
    Clayards, Meghan
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 34 (06) : 769 - 786
  • [7] Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations
    Bernstein, Lynne E.
    Eberhardt, Silvio P.
    Auer, Edward T., Jr.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2021, 42 (03) : 673 - 690
  • [8] A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements
    Gurler, Demet
    Doyle, Nathan
    Walker, Edgar
    Magnotti, John
    Beauchamp, Michael
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2015, 77 (04) : 1333 - 1341
  • [9] Induced gamma oscillations index individual differences in speech sound perception and production
    Ou, Jinghua
    Law, Sam-Po
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2018, 121 : 28 - 36
  • [10] Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech
    Drew J. McLaughlin
    Melissa M. Baese-Berk
    Tessa Bent
    Stephanie A. Borrie
    Kristin J. Van Engen
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2018, 80 : 1559 - 1570