Assessment of the fetal thymus by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound during normal human gestation and in fetuses with congenital heart defects

被引:40
作者
Li, L. [1 ,2 ]
Bahtiyar, M. O. [1 ]
Buhimschi, C. S. [1 ]
Zou, L. [2 ]
Zhou, Q. -C. [2 ]
Copel, J. A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Cent S Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Ultrason Med, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
congenital heart defects; fetus; thymus; ultrasound; volume; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; 22Q11; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE; GUIDELINES; STANDARDS; DELETION; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1002/uog.8853
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives Our objectives were to compare the size and volume of the developing fetal thymus obtained by two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) and three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US), develop normative data for thymus volume (TV), and investigate TV in fetuses with congenital heart disease (CHD) and normal twin gestations. Methods We studied 321 fetuses (gestational age (GA): 17-39 weeks) including 238 normal singletons, 64 normal twins and 19 singleton fetuses with CHD. We used 2D-US to assess fetal thymus maximum transverse diameter (MTD), maximum transverse area (MTA), anteroposterior diameter (APD) and superoinferior diameter (SID). TV was obtained by 3D-US using virtual organ computer-aided analysis. Measurements were adjusted for estimated fetal weight where appropriate. Linear regression analysis, general linear models and Fisher's Z-transformation were used where appropriate. A nomogram of fetal TV based on singleton gestations was produced according to previously published methods. Results Ultrasound assessment of the fetal thymus was possible in 95.3% (306/321) of cases. Both 3D-US and 2D-US measurements were significantly correlated with GA (TV r = 0.989; MTA r = 0.918; MTD r = 0.884; APD r = 0.849; and SID r = 0.816; all P < 0.05). After Fisher's Z-transformation, the correlation between the TV and GA was significantly stronger than that between any individual 2D-US measurement and GA (P < 0.05). Normal twin fetuses had TVs similar to those of singletons adjusted for estimated fetal weight and GA (P = 0.85). TV adjusted for estimated fetal weight and GA was significantly lower in fetuses with CHD than in normal singletons (P < 0.05). Conclusion 2D-US and 3D-US are useful tools for evaluation of the size and volume of the human fetal thymus through gestation. Fetal TV by 3D-US seems to reflect normal development of the thymus in utero better than do 2D-US measurements. Lower TV should be expected in association with CHDs. Copyright (C) 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 409
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
*AIUM, AIUM PRACT GUID PERF
[2]   A United States national reference for fetal growth [J].
Alexander, GR ;
Himes, JH ;
Kaufman, RB ;
Mor, J ;
Kogan, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (02) :163-168
[3]  
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2010, J Ultrasound Med, V29, P157
[5]   Prevalence of 22q11 deletion in fetuses with conotruncal cardiac defects: A 6-year prospective study [J].
Boudjemline, Y ;
Fermont, L ;
Le Bidois, J ;
Lyonnet, S ;
Sidi, D ;
Bonnet, D .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2001, 138 (04) :520-524
[6]   Absent or hypoplastic thymus on ultrasound:: a marker for deletion 22q11.2 in fetal cardiac defects [J].
Chaoui, R ;
Kalache, KD ;
Heling, KS ;
Tennstedt, C ;
Bommer, C ;
Körner, H .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) :546-552
[7]   Diameter of the normal fetal thymus on ultrasound [J].
Cho, J. Y. ;
Min, J. Y. ;
Lee, Y.-H. ;
McCrindles, B. ;
Hornbergers, L. K. ;
Yoo, S.-J. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 29 (06) :634-638
[8]  
DODSON WE, 1969, LANCET, V1, P574
[9]  
FELKER RE, 1989, J ULTRAS MED, V8, P669
[10]   Fetal thymus size in uncomplicated twin and singleton pregnancies [J].
Gamez, F. ;
De Leon-Luis, J. ;
Pintado, P. ;
Perez, R. ;
Robinson, J. N. ;
Antolin, E. ;
Ortiz-Quintana, L. ;
Santolaya-Forgas, J. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (03) :302-307