Ranking model of total quality management enablers in healthcare establishments using the best-worst method

被引:26
|
作者
Talib, Faisal [1 ]
Asjad, Mohammad [2 ]
Attri, Rajesh [3 ]
Siddiquee, Arshad Noor [2 ]
Khan, Zahid A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Zakir Husain Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Aligarh, India
[2] Jamia Millia Islamia, Dept Mech Engn, New Delhi, India
[3] JC Bose Univ Sci & Technol YMCA, Dept Mech Engn, Faridabad, India
来源
TQM JOURNAL | 2019年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
Leadership; Ranking; TQM enablers; Best-worst method (BWM); Healthcare establishments (HCEs); PERCEIVED DIMENSIONS; SERVICE QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; TQM; IMPLEMENTATION; SATISFACTION; INNOVATION; BARRIERS; OVERCOME;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-04-2019-0118
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeRecent years have witnessed a significant rise in Indian healthcare establishments (HCEs) which indicate that there is a constant need to improve the healthcare quality services through the adoption and implementation of TQM enablers. The purpose of this paper is to identify such enablers and then propose a ranking model for TQM implementation in Indian HCEs for improved performance. Design/methodology/approachThe study identifies 20 TQM enablers through comprehensive literature survey and expert's opinion, and classifies them into five main categories. The prominence of these enablers is established using a recently developed novel multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method, i.e. best-worst method (BWM). The importance of the various main category and sub-category enablers is decided on the basis of their weights which are determined by the BWM. In comparison to other MCDM methods, such as analytical hierarchy process, BWM requires relatively lesser comparison data and also provides consistent comparisons which results in both optimal and reliable weights of the enablers considered in this paper. Further, a sensitivity analysis is also carried out to ensure that the ranking (based on the optimal weights) of the various enablers is reliable and robust. FindingsThe results of this study reveal that out of five main category enablers, the "leadership-based enablers (E1)" and the "continuous improvement based enablers (E5)" are the most and the least important enablers, respectively. Similarly, among the 20 sub-category enablers, "quality leadership and role of physicians (E14)" and "performing regular survey of customer satisfaction and quality audit (E52)" are the most and the least dominating sub-category enablers, respectively. Research limitations/implicationsThis study does not explore the interrelationship between the various TQM enablers and also does not evaluate performance of the various HCEs based on the weights of the enablers. Practical implicationsThe priority of the TQM enablers determined in this paper enables decision makers to understand their influence on successful implementation of the TQM principles and policies in HCEs leading to an overall improvement in the system's performance. Originality/valueThis study identifies the various TQM enablers in HCEs and categorizes them into five main categories and ranks them using the BWM. The findings of this research are quite useful for management of the HCEs to properly understand the relative importance of these enablers so that managers can formulate an effective and efficient strategy for their easy and smooth implementation which is necessary for continuous improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 814
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Priority ranking for the best-worst method
    Tu, Jiancheng
    Wu, Zhibin
    Pedrycz, Witold
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 635 : 42 - 55
  • [2] Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best-Worst scaling method
    Pinto, Luis
    Kaynak, Erdener
    Chow, Clement S. F.
    Zhang, Lida L.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2019, 31 (01) : 223 - 245
  • [3] Ranking the Barriers to the Energy Upgrading of Buildings Using the Best-Worst Method
    Antoniou, Fani
    Mageiropoulos, Theofilos
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [4] Can We Move Beyond First-Choice DCEs Using Best-Worst Using Best-Worst, Best-Best or Ranking?
    Huls, Samare P. I.
    Lancsar, Emily
    Donkers, Bas
    Ride, Jemimah
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (06): : 866 - 866
  • [5] Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique
    Shojaei, Payam
    Haeri, Seyed Amin Seyed
    Mohammadi, Sahar
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 68 : 4 - 13
  • [6] Evaluating and Ranking the Supplier Selection Criteria for Additive Manufacturing Firms Using Best-Worst Method
    Ambilkar, Priya
    Verma, Priyanka
    Das, Debabrata
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 161 - 175
  • [7] Water Saving Management Contract, identification and ranking of risks based on life cycle and best-worst method
    Ma, Weimin
    Li, Xiaona
    Wang, Xiaosheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 306
  • [8] THE ADVANTAGES OF USING BEST-WORST MODEL FOR HYBRID PRODUCTS
    Tamas, Anca
    Popescu, Ruxandra
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH ECONOMICS & FINANCE CONFERENCE, 2017, : 354 - 363
  • [9] Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best-worst multi criteria decision making method
    Gupta, Himanshu
    Barua, Mukesh Kumar
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 107 : 69 - 79
  • [10] A modified lexicographic semi-order model using the best-worst method
    Safarzadeh, Soroush
    Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2018, 27 (02) : 78 - 91