Gestational diabetes: A review of the current literature and guidelines

被引:86
作者
Hollander, Martine H.
Paarlberg, K. Marieke
Huisjes, Anjoke J. M.
机构
[1] AZ Middelheim, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Gelre Ziekenhuizen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ogx.0000253303.92229.59
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Despite large numbers of original research studies spanning 4 decades there is still no consensus on the subject of gestational diabetes. Should all pregnant women be screened or only those with risk factors? Or is it safe not to screen at all? Which screening test and which diagnostic test are the most reliable? Which cutoff values should we use? What are the risks involved for mother and baby and can treatment improve outcome? What is the connection between gestational diabetes and diabetes mellitus type II? Are there disadvantages to screening? A review of relevant articles shows that definitive answers to these questions are not yet available. There is no gold standard screening test and no threshold glucose value above which complications are markedly increased. On the contrary, there appears to be a continuum of slowly increasing risks with rising blood glucose values, where it seems difficult to draw a clear line between pathology and physiology. Moreover, treatment has thus far not been shown to significantly improve outcome. There seems to be an indistinct area between the diagnosis of gestational diabetes and diabetes mellitus type 11, where women with risk factors for one are also predisposed to develop the other, thereby confusing the diagnosis. Finally, the disadvantages to diagnosing and treating women without a clearly proven benefit seem to be significant. Therefore it seems defensible to suspend all screening and treatment for gestational diabetes, or at least significantly raise the threshold for making a positive diagnosis and initiating treatment, until further research has proven a clear benefit. Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to summarize that there is still no worldwide consensus on the diagnosis, management, and adverse effects of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM); explain that all methods of screening vary in sensitivity and depend on very strict preparations for screening; state that there is no agreement on ideal levels of blood glucose to prevent untoward effects; and recall that there are two very large prospective studies that clarify the dark waters and that we should await their results.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 136
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
[31]   DETECTION OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES BY MEANS OF ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSIS OF EXCESSIVE FETAL GROWTH [J].
GRANDJEAN, H ;
SARRAMON, MF ;
DEMOUZON, J ;
REME, JM ;
PONTONNIER, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 138 (07) :790-792
[32]   REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE ORAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST IN PREGNANCY [J].
HARLASS, FE ;
BRADY, K ;
READ, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 164 (02) :564-568
[33]  
HARRIS M, 1979, DIABETES, V28, P1039
[34]   REFERENCE VALUES FOR 75G ORAL GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST IN PREGNANCY [J].
HATEM, M ;
ANTHONY, F ;
HOGSTON, P ;
ROWE, DJF ;
DENNIS, KJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 296 (6623) :676-678
[35]   GESTATIONAL DIABETES AND FOLLOW-UP AMONG IMMIGRANT VIETNAM-BORN WOMEN [J].
HENRY, OA ;
BEISCHER, NA ;
SHEEDY, MT ;
WALSTAB, JE .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 33 (02) :109-114
[36]   Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: A cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Herbst, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (03) :1035-1039
[37]  
IRION O, 2004, COCHRANE LIB
[38]   Maternal and perinatal outcomes in 143 Danish women with gestational diabetes mellitus and 143 controls with a similar risk profile [J].
Jensen, DM ;
Sorensen, B ;
Feilberg-Jorgensen, N ;
Westergaard, JG ;
Beck-Nielsen, H .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (04) :281-286
[39]  
Jevitt CM, 2005, J MIDWIFERY WOM HEAL, V50, P485, DOI 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.07.005
[40]   MATERNAL POSTPRANDIAL GLUCOSE-LEVELS AND INFANT BIRTH-WEIGHT - THE DIABETES IN EARLY-PREGNANCY STUDY [J].
JOVANOVICPETERSON, L ;
PETERSON, CM ;
REED, GF ;
METZGER, BE ;
MILLS, JL ;
KNOPP, RH ;
AARONS, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 164 (01) :103-111