Gestational diabetes: A review of the current literature and guidelines

被引:86
作者
Hollander, Martine H.
Paarlberg, K. Marieke
Huisjes, Anjoke J. M.
机构
[1] AZ Middelheim, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Gelre Ziekenhuizen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ogx.0000253303.92229.59
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Despite large numbers of original research studies spanning 4 decades there is still no consensus on the subject of gestational diabetes. Should all pregnant women be screened or only those with risk factors? Or is it safe not to screen at all? Which screening test and which diagnostic test are the most reliable? Which cutoff values should we use? What are the risks involved for mother and baby and can treatment improve outcome? What is the connection between gestational diabetes and diabetes mellitus type II? Are there disadvantages to screening? A review of relevant articles shows that definitive answers to these questions are not yet available. There is no gold standard screening test and no threshold glucose value above which complications are markedly increased. On the contrary, there appears to be a continuum of slowly increasing risks with rising blood glucose values, where it seems difficult to draw a clear line between pathology and physiology. Moreover, treatment has thus far not been shown to significantly improve outcome. There seems to be an indistinct area between the diagnosis of gestational diabetes and diabetes mellitus type 11, where women with risk factors for one are also predisposed to develop the other, thereby confusing the diagnosis. Finally, the disadvantages to diagnosing and treating women without a clearly proven benefit seem to be significant. Therefore it seems defensible to suspend all screening and treatment for gestational diabetes, or at least significantly raise the threshold for making a positive diagnosis and initiating treatment, until further research has proven a clear benefit. Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to summarize that there is still no worldwide consensus on the diagnosis, management, and adverse effects of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM); explain that all methods of screening vary in sensitivity and depend on very strict preparations for screening; state that there is no agreement on ideal levels of blood glucose to prevent untoward effects; and recall that there are two very large prospective studies that clarify the dark waters and that we should await their results.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 136
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Alberti KGMM, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P539, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics, 2001, Obstet Gynecol, V98, P525
[4]  
American Diabetes Association, 2003, Diabetes Care, V26 Suppl 1, pS103
[5]  
Avery M D, 2001, J Matern Fetal Med, V10, P52, DOI 10.1080/714904296
[6]  
BEAULIEU MD, 1992, CAN MED ASSOC J, V147, P435
[7]   EFFECT OF ADVANCING PREGNANCY ON THE GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST AND ON THE 50-G ORAL GLUCOSE-LOAD SCREENING-TEST FOR GESTATIONAL DIABETES [J].
BENJAMIN, F ;
WILSON, SJ ;
DEUTSCH, S ;
SELTZER, VL ;
DROESCH, K ;
DROESCH, J .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1986, 68 (03) :362-365
[8]  
Berger Howard, 2002, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, V24, P894
[9]   Screening for gestational diabetes: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Brody, SC ;
Harris, R ;
Lohr, K .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 101 (02) :380-392
[10]   USE OF FETAL ULTRASOUND TO SELECT METABOLIC THERAPY FOR PREGNANCIES COMPLICATED BY MILD GESTATIONAL DIABETES [J].
BUCHANAN, TA ;
KJOS, SL ;
MONTORO, MN ;
WU, PYK ;
MADRILEJO, NG ;
GONZALEZ, M ;
NUNEZ, V ;
PANTOJA, PM ;
XIANG, A .
DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (04) :275-283