Vegetation profiles in tropical forests from multibaseline interferometric synthetic aperture radar, field, and lidar measurements

被引:59
作者
Treuhaft, R. N. [1 ]
Chapman, B. D. [1 ]
dos Santos, J. R. [2 ]
Goncalves, F. G. [5 ]
Dutra, L. V. [4 ]
Graca, P. M. L. A. [6 ]
Drake, J. B. [3 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[2] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Espaciais, Div Sensoriamento Remoto, BR-12201 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[3] US Forest Serv, USDA, Tallahassee, FL 32303 USA
[4] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Espaciais, Div Proc Imagens, BR-12201 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[5] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Ecosyst & Soc, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[6] Inst Nacl de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Dept Ecol, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
LASER ALTIMETER; MAPPING VEGETATION; CANOPY STRUCTURE; BIOMASS; FUSION; SAR; BACKSCATTER; MICROCLIMATE; ATTENUATION; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1029/2008JD011674
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the estimation of vertical vegetation density profiles from multibaseline interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data from the AirSAR aircraft at C band over primary, secondary, and abandoned-pasture stands at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica in 2004. Profiles were also estimated from field data taken in 2006 and lidar data taken with the LVIS, 25 m spot instrument in 2005. After motivating the study of tropical forest profiles based on their role in the global carbon cycle, ecosystem state, and biodiversity, this paper describes the InSAR, field, and lidar data acquisitions and analyses. Beyond qualitative agreement between profiles from the 3 measurement techniques, results show that InSAR and lidar profile-averaged mean height have RMS scatters about field-measured means of 3.4 m and 3.2 m, 16% and 15% of the average mean height, respectively. InSAR and lidar standard deviations of the vegetation distribution have RMS scatters about the field standard deviations of 1.9 m and 1.5 m, or 27% and 21%, respectively. Dominant errors in the profile-averaged mean height for each measurement technique were modeled. InSAR inaccuracies, dominated by ambiguities in finding the ground altitude and coherence calibration, together account for about 3 m of InSAR error in the mean height. The dominant, modeled error for the field measurements was the inaccuracy in modeling the trees as uniformly filled volumes of leaf area, inducing field errors in mean height of about 3 m. The dominant, modeled lidar error, also due to finding the ground, was 2 m.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Interferometry and synthesis in radio astronomy
[2]  
[Anonymous], TERRESTRIAL GLOBAL P
[3]  
[Anonymous], PROCESSING NASA LVIS
[4]   Cloud cover in Landsat observations of the Brazilian Amazon [J].
Asner, GP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 22 (18) :3855-3862
[5]  
ASRAR G, 1989, THEORY APPL OPTICAL, P264
[6]  
Blair J.B., 2006, Processing of NASA LVIS elevation and canopy (LGE, LCE and LGW) data products
[7]   The Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor: a medium-altitude, digitisation-only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping vegetation and topography [J].
Blair, JB ;
Rabine, DL ;
Hofton, MA .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 54 (2-3) :115-122
[8]   Modeling laser altimeter return waveforms over complex vegetation using high-resolution elevation data [J].
Blair, JB ;
Hofton, MA .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1999, 26 (16) :2509-2512
[9]   Methods to assess tropical rain forest canopy structure: an overview [J].
Bongers, F .
PLANT ECOLOGY, 2001, 153 (1-2) :263-277
[10]   Predictions of microwave attenuation through vegetation: a comparison with measurements [J].
Bosisio, AV ;
Dechambre, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (19) :3973-3997