Factors Influencing Public Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:16
作者
Nie, Xiangtian [1 ]
Feng, Kai [1 ]
Wang, Shengnan [2 ]
Li, Yongxin [2 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ, Inst Psychol & Behav, Kaifeng, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
COVID-19; panic; pandemic-related knowledge; self-efficacy; risk; objective social support;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.576301
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been regarded as a public health emergency that caused a considerable degree of public panic (such as anxiety and insomnia) during its early stage. Some irrational behaviors (such as excessive search for information related to the pandemic and excessive hoarding of supplies) were also triggered as a result of such panic. Although there has been plenty of news coverage on public panic due to the outbreak, research on this phenomenon has been limited. Since panic is the main psychological reaction in the early stage of the pandemic, which largely determines the level of psychological adaptation, time of psychological recovery, and the incidence of PTSD, there exists a demand to conduct investigation on it. From a public governance perspective, the government's assessment of public panic may affect the efficiency and effectiveness of pandemic prevention and control. Therefore, it is of obvious practical significance to investigate public panic during the COVID-19 pandemic and analyze its influential factors. The self-compiled COVID-19 Social Mentality Questionnaire was used to collect data from a total of 16,616 participants online, and 13,511 valid responses were received. The results from the chi-square test showed that there were differences in gender, educational level, age, pandemic-related knowledge, self-efficacy, risk level, and objective social support. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis results showed that self-efficacy, gender, educational level, age, risk level, pandemic-related knowledge, and objective social support were significant predictors of public panic. Among the research variables, self-efficacy, gender, educational level, and age were negative predictors of panic while risk level, pandemic-related knowledge, and objective social support were positive predictors of panic.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] Huang XG., 2015, CHINESE J HLTH ED, V2, P112
  • [12] Lazarus R. S., 1984, Stress, appraisal, and coping, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215
  • [13] Li X., 2003, J CAP U MED SCI, V24, P487
  • [14] Liu Z., 2004, CHIN J EPIDEMIOL, V7, P48
  • [15] [苗丹民 Miao Danmin], 2006, [心理科学进展, ADVANCES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE], V14, P190
  • [16] Nadler A., 1991, REV PERSONALITY SOCI, V12, P290
  • [17] [谢晓非 Nie Xiaofei], 2005, [北京大学学报. 自然科学版, Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis], V41, P628
  • [18] Peng X., 2006, CHINA J HLTH PSYCHOL, V14, P299
  • [19] [钱铭怡 Qian Mingyi], 2003, [中国心理卫生杂志, Chinese Mental Health Journal], V17, P515
  • [20] [时勘 Shi Kan], 2004, [中国临床心理学杂志, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology], V12, P293