Prevention of chloride-induced corrosion damage to bridges

被引:8
作者
Cramer, SD [1 ]
Covino, BS
Bullard, SJ
Holcomb, GR
Russell, JH
Ziomek-Moroz, M
Virmani, YP
Butler, JT
Nelson, FJ
Thompson, NG
机构
[1] US DOE, Albany Res Ctr, Albany, OR 97321 USA
[2] USDOT, FHWA, Turner Fairbank Highway Res Ctr, Mclean, VA 22101 USA
[3] Joseph T Butler Inc, Wadsworth, OH 44282 USA
[4] Oregon Dept Transportat, Salem, OR 97310 USA
[5] CC Technol, Dublin, OH 43016 USA
关键词
cost of corrosion; bridges; reinforced concrete; steel; epoxy-coated rebar; stainless steel; corrosion; chloride; anodes; cathodic protection; microsilica concrete; metalizing; thermal spray;
D O I
10.2355/isijinternational.42.1376
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
The annual direct cost of bridge infrastructure corrosion to the U.S. economy is estimated at $8.3 billion, with indirect costs approximately 10 times higher. Of the approximately 600 000 bridges in the U.S., between 15% and 20% are listed as "structurally deficient", frequently due to corrosion damage. Five technologies are presented for reducing the cost of chloride-induced corrosion damage: (1) conductive coating anodes for cathodic protection of existing reinforce concrete bridges, (2) epoxy-coated rebar (ECR), (3) stainless steel rebar, and (4) high-performance concrete for extending the service life of new structures, and (5) metalizing to provide economical, long-term corrosion protection of steel bridges. Conductive coating anodes and stainless steel rebar represent ongoing work by the Oregon Department of Transportation with final verdicts not expected for years. The ECR and metalizing technology have longer track records and are better established in the bridge construction and protection industry. Application of these technologies is guided by a thorough understanding of their performance, of characteristics of the bridge and its environment, and of the results that are sought.
引用
收藏
页码:1376 / 1385
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] *AM NAT STAND I, 1993, GUID PROT STEEL THER
  • [2] *AM WELD SOC, 2001, SPEC THERM SPRAY FEE
  • [3] *ARM, 1999, RAMB CONS ENG PIER P
  • [4] BONSTEDT HO, 1998, CONCRETE INT, V20, P65
  • [5] *BRIT STAND I, 1977, COD PRACT PROT COAT, P21
  • [6] BULLARD SJ, 1999, P 14 INT CORR C CORR, P10
  • [7] COVINO BS, 2002, FHWAORRD0210 USDOT
  • [8] Corrosion prevention and remediation strategies for reinforced concrete coastal bridges
    Cramer, SD
    Covino, BS
    Bullard, SJ
    Holcomb, GR
    Russell, JH
    Nelson, FJ
    Laylor, HM
    Soltesz, SM
    [J]. CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2002, 24 (01) : 101 - 117
  • [9] Thermal sprayed titanium anode for cathodic protection of reinforced concrete bridges
    Cramer, SD
    Covino, BS
    Holcomb, GR
    Bullard, SJ
    Collins, WK
    Govier, RD
    Wilson, RD
    Laylor, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 8 (01) : 133 - 145
  • [10] CRAMER SD, 2002, 02265 NACE INT