In vitro and in vivo invasiveness of different pulsed-field get electrophoresis types of Listeria monocytogenes

被引:44
作者
Larsen, CN
Norrung, B
Sommer, HM
Jakobsen, M
机构
[1] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Vet Microbiol, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Dairy & Food Sci, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] Danish Vet & Food Adm, Inst Food Safety & Toxicol, Soborg, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AEM.68.11.5698-5703.2002
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The virulence of different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) types of Listeria monocytogenes was examined by monitoring their ability to invade Caco-2 cells. Strains belonging to seven different PFGE types originating from both foods and humans were included. No significant differences in invasiveness were detected between strains isolated from humans and those isolated from food. Strains belonging to PFGE type 1 expressed a significantly lower ability to invade cells compared to strains belonging to other PFGE types. Although strains of PFGE type 2 also seemed to invade at a low level, this was not significant in the present study. PFGE types 1 and 2 as well as type 14 are more frequently found in food than the four other PFGE types examined and moreover have a relatively low prevalence in humans compared to their prevalence in food. Thus, the hypothesis that some PFGE types are less virulent than others is supported by this study showing that certain PFGE types of L. monocytogenes commonly found in food are less invasive than others to Caco-2 cells. In contrast to the differences in invasion, identical intracellular growth rates between the different PFGE types were observed. In vivo studies of the actual ability of the strains to invade the liver and spleen of cimetidine-treated rats following an oral dose of 109 L. monocytogenes cells were performed for isolates of PFGE types 1, 2, 5, and 15. After 2 days, equal amounts of bacteria were observed in the liver and spleen of the rats for any of the PFGE types tested.
引用
收藏
页码:5698 / 5703
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
BROSCH R, 1993, J FOOD PROTECT, V56, P296, DOI 10.4315/0362-028X-56.4.297
[2]   PATHOGENICITY OF FOODBORNE, ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLINICAL ISOLATES OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES IN MICE [J].
CONNER, DE ;
SCOTT, VN ;
SUMNER, SS ;
BERNARD, DT .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1989, 54 (06) :1553-1556
[3]   VERIFICATION OF CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES ISOLATES IMPLICATED IN FOOD-BORNE OUTBREAKS OF LISTERIOSIS BY RANDOMLY AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA PATTERNS [J].
CZAJKA, J ;
BATT, CA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (05) :1280-1287
[4]   DIFFERENTIATION OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES AND LISTERIA-INNOCUA BY 16S RIBOSOMAL-RNA GENES AND INTRASPECIES DISCRIMINATION OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES STRAINS BY RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA POLYMORPHISMS [J].
CZAJKA, J ;
BSAT, N ;
PIANI, M ;
RUSS, W ;
SULTANA, K ;
WIEDMANN, M ;
WHITAKER, R ;
BATT, CA .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 59 (01) :304-308
[5]  
DELCORRAL F, 1990, J FOOD PROTECT, V53, P1003, DOI 10.4315/0362-028X-53.12.1003
[6]   Survival of osmotic and acid stress by Listeria monocytogenes strains of clinical or meat origin [J].
Dykes, GA ;
Moorhead, SM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 56 (2-3) :161-166
[7]   LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES, A FOOD-BORNE PATHOGEN [J].
FARBER, JM ;
PETERKIN, PI .
MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1991, 55 (03) :476-511
[8]   INVITRO MODEL OF PENETRATION AND INTRACELLULAR GROWTH OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES IN THE HUMAN ENTEROCYTE-LIKE CELL-LINE CACO-2 [J].
GAILLARD, JL ;
BERCHE, P ;
MOUNIER, J ;
RICHARD, S ;
SANSONETTI, P .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1987, 55 (11) :2822-2829
[9]   IS ANY STRAIN OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES DETECTED IN FOOD A HEALTH RISK [J].
HOF, H ;
ROCOURT, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 16 (03) :173-182
[10]   DIFFERENTIATION OF LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES, LISTERIA-INNOCUA, LISTERIA-IVANOVII, AND LISTERIA-SEELIGERI BY PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS [J].
HOWARD, PJ ;
HARSONO, KD ;
LUCHANSKY, JB .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 58 (02) :709-712