Emergency veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO)-supported percutaneous interventions in refractory cardiac arrest and profound cardiogenic shock

被引:13
|
作者
Radsel, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Goslar, Tomaz [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bunc, Matjaz [2 ,4 ]
Ksela, Jus [2 ,5 ]
Gorjup, Vojka [1 ,2 ]
Noc, Marko [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Ctr Intens Internal Med, Zaloska 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Minnesota, Med Sch, Cardiovasc Div, Ctr Resuscitat Med, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[5] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Cardiogenic shock; Cardiac arrest; VA ECMO; PCI; TAVI;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.028
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aims: We investigated the spectrum of emergency veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO)-supported interventions including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and invasive electrophysiology (EP). Methods and results: Between June 2010 and February 2020, 52 consecutive patients underwent VA ECMO implantation for refractory cardiac arrest (E-CPR) and 78 for profound cardiogenic shock. Percutaneous interventions on VA ECMO included PCI (n = 29), TAVI (n = 4) and EP (n = 1). Surgical interventions were cardiac (n = 36) or non-cardiac (n = 5). During PCI, ECMO flow was maintained at 2.7 +/- 1.0 L/min. Of the 40 treated lesions, 48% were located on left anterior descending and 20% on the left main artery. An average 2.0 +/- 1.8 DES/patient with diameter 3.2 +/- 0.5 mm and stented length 41 +/- 35 mm were implanted. PCI success was 83%. TAVI was performed in 4 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction 21 +/- 10% and mean aortic valve gradient 41 +/- 5 mmHg. After successful valve implantation supported by 1.4 +/- 0.1 L/min ECMO flow, mean gradient decreased to 11 +/- 5 mmHg without significant aortic regurgitation. In one patient radiofrequency ablation of His bundle followed by permanent pacemaker implantation was performed under ECMO flow of 2.8 L/min. Overall survival to hospital discharge with good neurological recovery was 29% in E-CPR and 44% in profound cardiogenic shock. Conclusions: Our study showed feasibility and effectiveness of VA ECMO-supported percutaneous interventions in patients with profound hemodynamic collapse.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 157
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock due to myocarditis in adult patients
    Pozzi, Matteo
    Banfi, Carlo
    Grinberg, Daniel
    Koffel, Catherine
    Bendjelid, Karim
    Robin, Jacques
    Giraud, Raphael
    Obadia, Jean Francois
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (07) : E495 - E502
  • [22] A retrospective cohort analysis of percutaneous versus side-graft perfusion techniques for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock
    Cakici, Mehmet
    Ozcinar, Evren
    Baran, Cagdas
    Bermede, Ahmet Onat
    Saricaoglu, Mehmet Cahit
    Inan, Mustafa Bahadir
    Durdu, Mustafa Serkan
    Aral, Atilla
    Sirlak, Mustafa
    Akar, Ahmet Ruchan
    PERFUSION-UK, 2017, 32 (05): : 363 - 371
  • [23] Acute neurological complications in adult patients with cardiogenic shock on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support
    Laimoud, Mohamed
    Ahmed, Walid
    EGYPTIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 72 (01)
  • [24] Impella combined with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for advanced hemodynamic support
    Giraud, Raphael
    Assouline, Benjamin
    Banfi, Carlo
    Bendjelid, Karim
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [25] Acute neurological complications in adult patients with cardiogenic shock on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support
    Mohamed Laimoud
    Walid Ahmed
    The Egyptian Heart Journal, 72
  • [26] Hemodynamic Effects and Clinical Outcomes of Left Atrial Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (LAVA-ECMO) in Cardiogenic Shock
    Villablanca, Pedro Arturo
    Fadel, Raef Ali
    Giustino, Gennaro
    Jabri, Ahmad
    Basir, Mir Babar
    Cowger, Jennifer
    Alaswad, Khaldoon
    O'Neill, Brian
    Gonzalez, Pedro Engel
    Gyzm, Gillian Grafton
    Frisoli, Tiberio
    Lee, James
    Aurora, Lindsey
    Gorgis, Sarah
    Nemeh, Hassan
    Apostolou, Dimitrios
    Alqarqaz, Mohammad
    Koenig, Gerald C.
    Aronow, Herbert D.
    Fuller, Brittany
    Aggarwal, Vikas
    O'Neill, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 236 : 79 - 85
  • [27] Upgrade from veno-arterial (VA) to veno-veno-arterial (VVA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in a patient with severe Harlequin syndrome
    Brand M.
    Christ M.
    Dierschke W.
    Amirie S.
    Roeing J.
    Grett M.
    Beko M.
    Breker I.
    Wennemann R.
    Trappe H.-J.
    Der Kardiologe, 2017, 11 (2): : 121 - 124
  • [28] Hemodynamic Management During Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Review
    Chengfen Yin
    Lei Xu
    Intensive Care Research, 2023, 3 (2): : 131 - 139
  • [29] Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock post-cardiac arrest
    de Chambrun, Marc Pineton
    Brechot, Nicolas
    Lebreton, Guillaume
    Schmidt, Matthieu
    Hekimian, Guillaume
    Demondion, Pierre
    Trouillet, Jean-Louis
    Leprince, Pascal
    Chastre, Jean
    Combes, Alain
    Luyt, Charles-Edouard
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (12) : 1999 - 2007
  • [30] Is there additional value in adding Impella to veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock?
    Merdler, Ilan
    Case, Brian C.
    Pahuja, Mohit
    Hayat, Fatima
    Isaac, Imad
    Gadodia, Ritika
    Chitturi, Kalyan R.
    Reddy, Pavan K.
    Cellamare, Matteo
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Waksman, Ron
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2024, 68 : 101 - 103