Emergency veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO)-supported percutaneous interventions in refractory cardiac arrest and profound cardiogenic shock

被引:13
|
作者
Radsel, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Goslar, Tomaz [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bunc, Matjaz [2 ,4 ]
Ksela, Jus [2 ,5 ]
Gorjup, Vojka [1 ,2 ]
Noc, Marko [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Ctr Intens Internal Med, Zaloska 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Minnesota, Med Sch, Cardiovasc Div, Ctr Resuscitat Med, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[5] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Cardiogenic shock; Cardiac arrest; VA ECMO; PCI; TAVI;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.028
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aims: We investigated the spectrum of emergency veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO)-supported interventions including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and invasive electrophysiology (EP). Methods and results: Between June 2010 and February 2020, 52 consecutive patients underwent VA ECMO implantation for refractory cardiac arrest (E-CPR) and 78 for profound cardiogenic shock. Percutaneous interventions on VA ECMO included PCI (n = 29), TAVI (n = 4) and EP (n = 1). Surgical interventions were cardiac (n = 36) or non-cardiac (n = 5). During PCI, ECMO flow was maintained at 2.7 +/- 1.0 L/min. Of the 40 treated lesions, 48% were located on left anterior descending and 20% on the left main artery. An average 2.0 +/- 1.8 DES/patient with diameter 3.2 +/- 0.5 mm and stented length 41 +/- 35 mm were implanted. PCI success was 83%. TAVI was performed in 4 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction 21 +/- 10% and mean aortic valve gradient 41 +/- 5 mmHg. After successful valve implantation supported by 1.4 +/- 0.1 L/min ECMO flow, mean gradient decreased to 11 +/- 5 mmHg without significant aortic regurgitation. In one patient radiofrequency ablation of His bundle followed by permanent pacemaker implantation was performed under ECMO flow of 2.8 L/min. Overall survival to hospital discharge with good neurological recovery was 29% in E-CPR and 44% in profound cardiogenic shock. Conclusions: Our study showed feasibility and effectiveness of VA ECMO-supported percutaneous interventions in patients with profound hemodynamic collapse.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 157
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest
    Lee, Soo Youn
    Jeon, Ki-Hyun
    Lee, Hyun Jong
    Kim, Ji-Bak
    Fang, Ho-Jun
    Kim, Je Sang
    Kim, Tae Hoon
    Park, Jin-Sik
    Choi, Rak Kyeong
    Choi, Young Jin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2020, 43 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [2] Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for emergency cardiac support
    Terri, Sun
    Andrew, Guy
    Amandeep, Sidhu
    Gordon, Finlayson
    Brian, Grunau
    Lillian, Ding
    Saida, Harle
    Leith, Dewar
    Richard, Cook
    Hussein, Kanji
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 44 : 31 - 38
  • [3] Overview of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock
    Tsangaris, Adamantios
    Alexy, Tamas
    Kalra, Rajat
    Kosmopoulos, Marinos
    Elliott, Andrea
    Bartos, Jason A.
    Yannopoulos, Demetris
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [4] Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock
    Jhand, Aravdeep
    Shabbir, Muhammad Asim
    Um, John
    Velagapudi, Poonam
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2023, (199): : 1 - 16
  • [5] Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: how much pump flow is enough?
    Pappalardo, Federico
    Montisci, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (10) : E1444 - E1448
  • [6] Extracorporeal support in cardiogenic shock with veno-arterial ECMO
    Orrego, Rodrigo
    Gaete, Barbara
    REVISTA MEDICA CLINICA LAS CONDES, 2022, 33 (03): : 282 - 293
  • [7] Transfer of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Using Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Ali, Jason M.
    Vuylsteke, Alain
    Fowles, Jo-Anne
    Pettit, Stephen
    Salaunkey, Kiran
    Bhagra, Sai
    Lewis, Clive
    Parameshwar, Jayan
    Kydd, Anna
    Patvardhan, Chinmay
    Jones, Nicola
    Rubino, Antonio
    Abu-Omar, Yasir
    Sudarshan, Catherine
    Tsui, Steven
    Catarino, Pedro
    Jenkins, David P.
    Berman, Marius
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (02) : 374 - 382
  • [8] Initiation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiogenic shock during out of hours versus working hours is not associated with increased mortality
    van der Wal, P. S.
    Kraaijeveld, A. O.
    van der Heijden, J. J.
    van Laake, L. W.
    Platenkamp, M.
    de Heer, L. M.
    Braithwaite, S. A.
    van Eijk, M. M. J.
    Hermens, J. A. J.
    Cremer, O. L.
    Donker, D. W.
    Meuwese, C. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 45 (03) : 301 - 308
  • [9] Emergency percutaneous implantation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the catheterisation laboratory
    Goslar, Tomaz
    Knafelj, Rihard
    Radsel, Peter
    Fister, Misa
    Golicnik, Alenka
    Steblovnik, Klemen
    Gorjup, Vojka
    Noc, Marko
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2016, 12 (12) : 1465 - 1472
  • [10] Acute mesenteric ischaemia in refractory shock on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
    Renaudier, Marie
    de Roux, Quentin
    Bougouin, Wulfran
    Boccara, Johanna
    Dubost, Baptiste
    Attias, Arie
    Fiore, Antonio
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Folliguet, Thierry
    Mule, Sebastien
    Amiot, Aurelien
    Langeron, Olivier
    Mongardon, Nicolas
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2021, 10 (01) : 62 - 70