Comparison of different vector Preisach models for the simulation of ferromagnetic materials

被引:3
|
作者
Nierla, Michael [1 ]
Loeffler, Michael [1 ]
Kaltenbacher, Manfred [2 ]
Rupitsch, Stefan Johann [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Elect Elect & Commun Engn, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Mech & Mechatron, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Magnetic hysteresis; Everett function; Vector Preisach model; Material modelling; Computational electromagnetics; Vector vibrating sample magnetometer; Vector hysteresis;
D O I
10.1108/COMPEL-12-2018-0494
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose The numerical computation of magnetization processes in moving and rotating assemblies requires the usage of vector hysteresis models. A commonly used model is the so-called Mayergoyz vector Preisach model, which applies the scalar Preisach model into multiple angles of the halfspace. The usage of several scalar models, which are optionally weighted differently, enables the description of isotropic as well as anisotropic materials. The flexibility is achieved, however, at the cost of multiple scalar model evaluations. For solely isotropic materials, two vector Preisach models, based on an extra rotational operator, might offer a lightweight alternative in terms of evaluation cost. The study aims at comparing the three mentioned models with respect to computational efficiency and practical applicability. Design/methodology/approach The three mentioned vector Preisach models are compared with respect to their computational costs and their representation of magnetic polarization curves measured by a vector vibrating sample magnetometer. Findings The results prove the applicability of all three models to practical scenarios and show the higher efficiency of the vector models based on rotational operators in terms of computational time. Originality/value Although the two vector Preisach models, based on an extra rotational operator, have been proposed in 2012 and 2015, their practical application and inversion has not been tested yet. This paper not only shows the usability of these particular vector Preisach models but also proves the efficiency of a special stageless evaluation approach that was proposed in a former contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:1696 / 1710
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A thermodynamic vector hysteresis model for ferromagnetic materials
    Bergqvist, AJ
    NONLINEAR ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS, 1996, 10 : 528 - 531
  • [32] Influence of Magnetic Interactions on the Demagnetization Scheme of Multiple Ferromagnetic Materials by Using Preisach Model
    Im, Sang Hyeon
    Lee, Ho Yeong
    Chung, Hyun Ju
    Park, Gwan Soo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2019, 55 (11)
  • [33] Comparison of neural network and polynomial models for the approximation of nonlinear and anisotropic ferromagnetic materials
    Vande Sande, H
    Hameyer, K
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-SCIENCE MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 149 (05) : 214 - 217
  • [34] Experimental-Numerical Method for Identification of Weighting Function in Preisach Model for Ferromagnetic Materials
    Eichler, Jakub
    Novak, Miroslav
    Kosek, Miloslav
    2016 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ELECTRONICS (AE), 2016, : 75 - 80
  • [35] Application of Preisach model to grain oriented steels: Comparison of different characterizations for the Preisach function p(α, β)
    Rouve, L.-L.
    Waeckerle, Th.
    Kedous-Lebouc, A.
    IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1995, 31 (6 pt 2): : 3557 - 3559
  • [36] Comparison of Four Different Types of Ferromagnetic Materials for Fault Current Limiter Applications
    Prigmore, Jay R.
    Mendoza, Jorge A.
    Karady, George G.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2013, 28 (03) : 1491 - 1498
  • [37] Comparison of Different Simulation Models and Simulation Methods for Energy Storage Trams
    Wu J.
    Zhang C.
    Zhang W.
    Li T.
    Wang X.
    1600, Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering (40): : 5148 - 5161
  • [38] Comparison of different combustion models in enclosure fire simulation
    Xue, H
    Ho, JC
    Cheng, YM
    FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2001, 36 (01) : 37 - 54
  • [39] A comparison of two different IMPSAT models in compositional simulation
    Haukas, J.
    Aavatsmark, I.
    Espedal, M.
    Reiso, E.
    SPE JOURNAL, 2007, 12 (01): : 145 - 151
  • [40] Comparison of different material models by simulation of an excavation.
    Bode, Manuel
    Schranz, Fabian
    Medicus, Gertraud
    Fellin, Wolfgang
    GEOTECHNIK, 2019, 42 (01) : 11 - 20