The inappropriate use of HbA1c testing to monitor glycemia: is there evidence in laboratory data?

被引:19
作者
Akan, Pinar [1 ]
Cimrin, Dilek
Ormen, Murat
Kume, Tuncay
Ozkaya, Aygul
Ergor, Gul
Abacioglu, Hakan
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biochem, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Univ Hosp, Cent Clin Lab, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Biostat, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
clinical laboratory information systems; forms and records control; hemoglobin A glycosylated; practice guideline; unnecessary procedures; utilization review;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00641.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims and objectives Diabetes is a chronic illness and have relatively high prevalence. Glycemic control is fundamental to the management of diabetes. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a commonly used laboratory test to monitor glycemia and to manage diabetes. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of the frequency of HbA1c test order with respect to the commonly approved guidelines for monitoring glycaemia of patients. Methods To assess the rate of inappropriate test orders, laboratory records of HbA1c tests ordered between 2002 and 2004 were evaluated. Inappropriate orders were defined as any order for a given patient that takes place within a 29- or 89-day-period following the previous HbA1c order. The effects of various parameters, like ordering clinics, the first HbA1c level, or the on-line availability of test results on test ordering were evaluated. Results Evaluation of test intervals showed that 10.3% of all orders and 33.8% of the inpatients' orders were performed within 29 days, 35.5% of all orders and 55% of the inpatients' orders were within 89 days. Conclusions Inappropriate laboratory utilization of HbA1c testing is very common especially in the inpatient clinics. We think that the application of the guidelines may decrease unnecessary health expenditure.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 24
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*AM DIAB ASS, 2004, DIABETES CARE S, V27, P76
[2]  
Amos AF, 1997, DIABETIC MED, V14, pS7, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199712)14:5+<S7::AID-DIA522>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-I
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DIABETES CARE, V28, pS4
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HEDIS 2000 TECHN SPE
[6]   Is HbA1c affected by glycemic instability? [J].
Derr, R ;
Garrett, E ;
Stacy, GA ;
Saudek, CD .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (10) :2728-2733
[7]   REDUCING UNNECESSARY LABORATORY USE WITH NEW TEST REQUEST FORM - EXAMPLE OF TUMOR-MARKERS [J].
DURANDZALESKI, I ;
RYMER, JC ;
ROUDOTTHORAVAL, F ;
REVUZ, J ;
ROSA, J .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8864) :150-153
[8]  
Emerson JF, 2001, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V116, P879
[9]   Tests of glycemia in diabetes [J].
Goldstein, DE ;
Little, RR ;
Lorenz, RA ;
Malone, JI ;
Nathan, D ;
Peterson, CM ;
Sacks, DB .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (07) :1761-1773
[10]  
Hampers LC, 1999, PEDIATRICS, V103, P877