Deep Learning for Real -time, Automatic, and Scanner-adapted Prostate (Zone) Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound, for Example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging ?transrectal Ultrasound

被引:33
作者
van Sloun, Ruud J. G. [1 ]
Wildeboer, Rogier R. [2 ]
Mannaerts, Christophe K. [2 ]
Postema, Arnoud W. [2 ]
Gayet, Maudy [3 ]
Beerlage, Harrie P. [1 ,2 ]
Salomon, Georg [4 ]
Wijkstra, Hessel [1 ,2 ]
Mischi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Lab Biomed Diagnost, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 01期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Segmentation; Ultrasound magnetic resonance imaging? transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy; IN-BORE; BIOPSY; ANATOMY; BRACHYTHERAPY; FUSION; IMAGES; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imag-ing (MRI) led to an increase in MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsies, these are time consuming, laborious, and costly. Introduction of deep-learning approach would improve prostate segmentation. Objective: To exploit deep learning to perform automatic, real-time prostate (zone) segmentation on TRUS images from different scanners. Design, setting, and participants: Three datasets with TRUS images were collected at different institutions, using an iU22 (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA), a Pro Focus 2202a (BK Medical), and an Aixplorer (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) ultrasound scanner. The datasets contained 436 images from 181 men. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Manual delineations from an expert panel were used as ground truth. The (zonal) segmentation performance was evaluated in terms of the pixel-wise accuracy, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance. Results and limitations: The developed deep-learning approach was demonstrated to significantly improve prostate segmentation compared with a conventional automated technique, reaching median accuracy of 98% (95% confidence interval 95-99%), a Jaccard index of 0.93 (0.80-0.96), anda Hausdorff distance of 3.0 (1.3-8.7) mm. Zonal segmentation yielded pixel-wise accuracy of 97% (95-99%) and 98% (96-99%) for the peripheral and transition zones, respectively. Supervised domain adaptation resulted in retainment of high performance when applied to images from different ultrasound scanners (p > 0.05). Moreover, the algorithm's assessment of its own segmentation performance showed a strong correlation with the actual segmentation performance (Pearson's correlation 0.72, p < 0.001), indicating that possible incorrect segmentations can be identified swiftly. Conclusions: Fusion-guided prostate biopsies, targeting suspicious lesions on MRI using TRUS are increasingly performed. The requirement for (semi)manual prostate delineation places a substantial burden on clinicians. Deep learning provides a means for fast and accurate (zonal) prostate segmentation of TRUS images that translates to different scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 85
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal Number of Systematic Biopsy Cores Used in Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Teraoka, Shogo
    Honda, Masashi
    Shimizu, Ryutaro
    Nishikawa, Ryoma
    Kimura, Yusuke
    Yumioka, Tetsuya
    Iwamoto, Hideto
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Hikita, Katsuya
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    YONAGO ACTA MEDICA, 2021, 64 (03) : 260 - 268
  • [42] Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: Systematic and/or magnetic-resonance imaging-targeted
    Bladou, Franck
    Fogaing, Cora
    Levental, Mark
    Aronson, Samuel
    Alameldin, Mona
    Anidjar, Maurice
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (09): : E330 - E337
  • [43] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy
    Yuen, JSP
    Thng, CH
    Tan, PH
    Khin, LW
    Phee, SJL
    Xiao, D
    Lau, WKO
    Ng, WS
    Cheng, CWS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) : 1482 - 1486
  • [44] Critical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted, Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Transperineal Fusion Biopsy for Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Roethke, Matthias C.
    Seidenader, Jonas
    Simpfendoerfer, Tobias
    Boxler, Silvan
    Alammar, Khalid
    Rieker, Philip
    Popeneciu, Valentin I.
    Roth, Wilfried
    Pahernik, Sascha
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (04) : 1380 - 1386
  • [45] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Single-Centre Study
    Junker, Daniel
    Schafer, Georg
    Heidegger, Isabel
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Ladurner, Michael
    Jaschke, Werner
    Aigner, Friedrich
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 94 (03) : 313 - 318
  • [46] Gleason Score Determination with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies-Are We Gaining in Accuracy?
    Lanz, Camille
    Cornud, Francois
    Beuvon, Frederic
    Lefevre, Arnaud
    Legmann, Paul
    Zerbib, Marc
    Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (01) : 88 - 93
  • [47] The application of intraoperative frozen section examination in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy during a major pandemic
    Ding, Xue-Fei
    Luan, Yang
    Zhu, Liang-Yong
    Xiao, Qin
    Chen, Ji
    Chen, Hao-Peng
    Han, Yue-Xing
    Liu, Zhong
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (04) : 2378 - 2384
  • [48] Comparison of prostate volume, shape, and contouring variability determined from preimplant magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images
    Liu, Derek
    Usmani, Nawaid
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Kamal, Wafa
    Pedersen, John
    Pervez, Nadeem
    Yee, Don
    Danielson, Brita
    Murtha, Albert
    Amanie, John
    Sloboda, Ron S.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2012, 11 (04) : 284 - 291
  • [49] Deep Learning-Based Methods for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Comelli, Albert
    Dahiya, Navdeep
    Stefano, Alessandro
    Vernuccio, Federica
    Portoghese, Marzia
    Cutaia, Giuseppe
    Bruno, Alberto
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Yezzi, Anthony
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 13
  • [50] Free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: single-center experience in China
    Zhang, Qing
    Wang, Wei
    Yang, Rong
    Zhang, Gutian
    Zhang, Bing
    Li, Weiping
    Huang, Haifeng
    Guo, Hongqian
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (05) : 727 - 733