Deep Learning for Real -time, Automatic, and Scanner-adapted Prostate (Zone) Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound, for Example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging ?transrectal Ultrasound

被引:33
作者
van Sloun, Ruud J. G. [1 ]
Wildeboer, Rogier R. [2 ]
Mannaerts, Christophe K. [2 ]
Postema, Arnoud W. [2 ]
Gayet, Maudy [3 ]
Beerlage, Harrie P. [1 ,2 ]
Salomon, Georg [4 ]
Wijkstra, Hessel [1 ,2 ]
Mischi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Lab Biomed Diagnost, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 01期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Segmentation; Ultrasound magnetic resonance imaging? transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy; IN-BORE; BIOPSY; ANATOMY; BRACHYTHERAPY; FUSION; IMAGES; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imag-ing (MRI) led to an increase in MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsies, these are time consuming, laborious, and costly. Introduction of deep-learning approach would improve prostate segmentation. Objective: To exploit deep learning to perform automatic, real-time prostate (zone) segmentation on TRUS images from different scanners. Design, setting, and participants: Three datasets with TRUS images were collected at different institutions, using an iU22 (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA), a Pro Focus 2202a (BK Medical), and an Aixplorer (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) ultrasound scanner. The datasets contained 436 images from 181 men. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Manual delineations from an expert panel were used as ground truth. The (zonal) segmentation performance was evaluated in terms of the pixel-wise accuracy, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance. Results and limitations: The developed deep-learning approach was demonstrated to significantly improve prostate segmentation compared with a conventional automated technique, reaching median accuracy of 98% (95% confidence interval 95-99%), a Jaccard index of 0.93 (0.80-0.96), anda Hausdorff distance of 3.0 (1.3-8.7) mm. Zonal segmentation yielded pixel-wise accuracy of 97% (95-99%) and 98% (96-99%) for the peripheral and transition zones, respectively. Supervised domain adaptation resulted in retainment of high performance when applied to images from different ultrasound scanners (p > 0.05). Moreover, the algorithm's assessment of its own segmentation performance showed a strong correlation with the actual segmentation performance (Pearson's correlation 0.72, p < 0.001), indicating that possible incorrect segmentations can be identified swiftly. Conclusions: Fusion-guided prostate biopsies, targeting suspicious lesions on MRI using TRUS are increasingly performed. The requirement for (semi)manual prostate delineation places a substantial burden on clinicians. Deep learning provides a means for fast and accurate (zonal) prostate segmentation of TRUS images that translates to different scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 85
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Radiomics and Deep Learning for the Segmentation of Fetal and Maternal Anatomy in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound
    Torrents-Barrena, Jordina
    Monill, Nuria
    Piella, Gemma
    Gratacos, Eduard
    Eixarch, Elisenda
    Ceresa, Mario
    Ballester, Miguel A. Gonzalez
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 173 - 188
  • [32] Learning curve for fusion magnetic resonance imaging targeted prostate biopsy and three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography segmentation
    Lenfant, Louis
    Beitone, Clement
    Troccaz, Jocelyne
    Roupret, Morgan
    Seisen, Thomas
    Voros, Sandrine
    Mozer, Pierre C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (06) : 709 - 716
  • [33] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Lotan, Yair
    Xi, Yin
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Freifeld, Yuval
    Margulis, Vitaly
    Raj, Ganesh
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Hornberger, Brad
    Desai, Neil
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    Francis, Franto
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (04): : 397 - 404
  • [34] Histology results of systematic prostate biopsies by in-bore magnetic resonance imaging vs. transrectal ultrasound
    Lazarovich, Alon
    Raviv, Gil
    Laitman, Yael
    Portnoy, Orith
    Raz, Orit
    Dotan, Zohar A.
    Ramon, Jacob
    Rosenzweig, Barak
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (05): : E244 - E247
  • [35] Clinically low-risk prostate cancer: evaluation with transrectal doppler ultrasound and functional magnetic resonance imaging
    Novis, Maria Ines
    Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
    de Oliveira Cerri, Luciana Mendes
    Mattedi, Romulo Loss
    Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [36] Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review
    Rai, Bhavan Prasad
    Mayerhofer, Christoph
    Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Nagele, Udo
    Tokas, Theodoros
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06): : 904 - 913
  • [37] Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measurement of extramural tumor spread in rectal cancer
    Rafaelsen, Soren R.
    Vagn-Hansen, Chris
    Sorensen, Torben
    Ploen, John
    Jakobsen, Anders
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (36) : 5021 - 5026
  • [38] Development and validation of a predictive model for determining clinically significant prostate cancer in men with negative magnetic resonance imaging after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Liu, Gang
    Zhu, Yuze
    Yao, Zichuan
    Jiang, Yunzhong
    Wu, Bin
    Bai, Song
    PROSTATE, 2021, 81 (13) : 983 - 991
  • [39] Where Do Transrectal Ultrasound- and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies Miss Significant Prostate Cancer?
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    UROLOGY, 2017, 110 : 154 - 160
  • [40] Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Platzek, Ivan
    Toma, Marieta
    Laniado, Michael
    Baretton, Gustavo
    Froehner, Michael
    Koch, Rainer
    Wirth, Manfred
    Zastrow, Stefan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (06) : 873 - 879