Deep Learning for Real -time, Automatic, and Scanner-adapted Prostate (Zone) Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound, for Example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging ?transrectal Ultrasound

被引:33
|
作者
van Sloun, Ruud J. G. [1 ]
Wildeboer, Rogier R. [2 ]
Mannaerts, Christophe K. [2 ]
Postema, Arnoud W. [2 ]
Gayet, Maudy [3 ]
Beerlage, Harrie P. [1 ,2 ]
Salomon, Georg [4 ]
Wijkstra, Hessel [1 ,2 ]
Mischi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Lab Biomed Diagnost, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 01期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Segmentation; Ultrasound magnetic resonance imaging? transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy; IN-BORE; BIOPSY; ANATOMY; BRACHYTHERAPY; FUSION; IMAGES; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imag-ing (MRI) led to an increase in MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsies, these are time consuming, laborious, and costly. Introduction of deep-learning approach would improve prostate segmentation. Objective: To exploit deep learning to perform automatic, real-time prostate (zone) segmentation on TRUS images from different scanners. Design, setting, and participants: Three datasets with TRUS images were collected at different institutions, using an iU22 (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA), a Pro Focus 2202a (BK Medical), and an Aixplorer (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) ultrasound scanner. The datasets contained 436 images from 181 men. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Manual delineations from an expert panel were used as ground truth. The (zonal) segmentation performance was evaluated in terms of the pixel-wise accuracy, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance. Results and limitations: The developed deep-learning approach was demonstrated to significantly improve prostate segmentation compared with a conventional automated technique, reaching median accuracy of 98% (95% confidence interval 95-99%), a Jaccard index of 0.93 (0.80-0.96), anda Hausdorff distance of 3.0 (1.3-8.7) mm. Zonal segmentation yielded pixel-wise accuracy of 97% (95-99%) and 98% (96-99%) for the peripheral and transition zones, respectively. Supervised domain adaptation resulted in retainment of high performance when applied to images from different ultrasound scanners (p > 0.05). Moreover, the algorithm's assessment of its own segmentation performance showed a strong correlation with the actual segmentation performance (Pearson's correlation 0.72, p < 0.001), indicating that possible incorrect segmentations can be identified swiftly. Conclusions: Fusion-guided prostate biopsies, targeting suspicious lesions on MRI using TRUS are increasingly performed. The requirement for (semi)manual prostate delineation places a substantial burden on clinicians. Deep learning provides a means for fast and accurate (zonal) prostate segmentation of TRUS images that translates to different scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 85
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Improves Cancer Detection Following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy and Correlates With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Chung, Paul H.
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Baccala, Angelo A., Jr.
    Kruecker, Jochen
    Benjamin, Compton J.
    Xu, Sheng
    Yan, Pingkun
    Kadoury, Samuel
    Chua, Celene
    Locklin, Julia K.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Gates, Stacey P.
    Buckner, Carey
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Glossop, Neil D.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) : 1281 - 1285
  • [22] Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3+4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy
    Garcia-Reyes, Kirema
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Zagoria, Ronald J.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Behr, Spencer C.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (03) : 699 - 705
  • [23] The Impact of Prostate Volume on Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound in Biopsy-naive Men
    Ye, Jianjun
    Zhang, Chichen
    Zheng, Lei
    Wang, Qihao
    Wu, Qiyou
    Tu, Xiang
    Bao, Yige
    Wei, Qiang
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 64 : 1 - 8
  • [24] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Detect Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsies
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir
    Yerram, Nitin K.
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Volkin, Dmitry
    Hoang, An
    Turkbey, Baris
    Gupta, Gopal N.
    Kruecker, Jochen
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (06) : 2152 - 2157
  • [25] Targeted MRI-guided Prostate Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: Initial Clinical Experience With Real-time 3-Dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound Guidance and Magnetic Resonance/Transrectal Ultrasound Image Fusion
    Fiard, Gaelle
    Hohn, Noelie
    Descotes, Jean-Luc
    Rambeaud, Jean-Jacques
    Troccaz, Jocelyne
    Long, Jean-Alexandre
    UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (06) : 1372 - 1378
  • [26] Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Transrectal Ultrasound in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Study With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Zhang, Mingbo
    Tang, Jie
    Luo, Yukun
    Wang, Yiru
    Wu, Meng
    Memmott, Benjamin
    Gao, Jing
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (07) : 1823 - 1830
  • [27] Comparison of conventional transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and micro-ultrasound for visualizing prostate cancer in an active surveillance population: A feasibility study
    Eure, Gregg
    Fanney, Daryl
    Lin, Jefferson
    Wodlinger, Brian
    Ghai, Sangeet
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (03): : E70 - E77
  • [28] Accuracy of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion for Detection of Prostate Cancer During Brachytherapy
    Bubley, Glenn J.
    Bloch, B. N.
    Vazquez, Cesar
    Genega, Elizabeth
    Holupka, Ed
    Rofsky, Neil
    Kaplan, Irving
    UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (06) : 1284 - 1289
  • [29] Label-driven magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) registration using weakly supervised learning for MRI-guided prostate radiotherapy
    Zeng, Qiulan
    Fu, Yabo
    Tian, Zhen
    Lei, Yang
    Zhang, Yupei
    Wang, Tonghe
    Mao, Hui
    Liu, Tian
    Curran, Walter J.
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Patel, Pretesh
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (13)
  • [30] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06) : 1749 - 1754