Deep Learning for Real -time, Automatic, and Scanner-adapted Prostate (Zone) Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound, for Example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging ?transrectal Ultrasound

被引:33
|
作者
van Sloun, Ruud J. G. [1 ]
Wildeboer, Rogier R. [2 ]
Mannaerts, Christophe K. [2 ]
Postema, Arnoud W. [2 ]
Gayet, Maudy [3 ]
Beerlage, Harrie P. [1 ,2 ]
Salomon, Georg [4 ]
Wijkstra, Hessel [1 ,2 ]
Mischi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Lab Biomed Diagnost, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 01期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Segmentation; Ultrasound magnetic resonance imaging? transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy; IN-BORE; BIOPSY; ANATOMY; BRACHYTHERAPY; FUSION; IMAGES; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imag-ing (MRI) led to an increase in MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsies, these are time consuming, laborious, and costly. Introduction of deep-learning approach would improve prostate segmentation. Objective: To exploit deep learning to perform automatic, real-time prostate (zone) segmentation on TRUS images from different scanners. Design, setting, and participants: Three datasets with TRUS images were collected at different institutions, using an iU22 (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA), a Pro Focus 2202a (BK Medical), and an Aixplorer (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) ultrasound scanner. The datasets contained 436 images from 181 men. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Manual delineations from an expert panel were used as ground truth. The (zonal) segmentation performance was evaluated in terms of the pixel-wise accuracy, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance. Results and limitations: The developed deep-learning approach was demonstrated to significantly improve prostate segmentation compared with a conventional automated technique, reaching median accuracy of 98% (95% confidence interval 95-99%), a Jaccard index of 0.93 (0.80-0.96), anda Hausdorff distance of 3.0 (1.3-8.7) mm. Zonal segmentation yielded pixel-wise accuracy of 97% (95-99%) and 98% (96-99%) for the peripheral and transition zones, respectively. Supervised domain adaptation resulted in retainment of high performance when applied to images from different ultrasound scanners (p > 0.05). Moreover, the algorithm's assessment of its own segmentation performance showed a strong correlation with the actual segmentation performance (Pearson's correlation 0.72, p < 0.001), indicating that possible incorrect segmentations can be identified swiftly. Conclusions: Fusion-guided prostate biopsies, targeting suspicious lesions on MRI using TRUS are increasingly performed. The requirement for (semi)manual prostate delineation places a substantial burden on clinicians. Deep learning provides a means for fast and accurate (zonal) prostate segmentation of TRUS images that translates to different scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 85
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound using magnetic resonance imaging priors
    Zeng, Qi
    Samei, Golnoosh
    Karimi, Davood
    Kesch, Claudia
    Mahdavi, Sara S.
    Abolmaesumi, Purang
    Salcudean, Septimiu E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2018, 13 (06) : 749 - 757
  • [2] Automatic prostate segmentation using deep learning on clinically diverse 3D transrectal ultrasound images
    Orlando, Nathan
    Gillies, Derek J.
    Gyacskov, Igor
    Romagnoli, Cesare
    D'Souza, David
    Fenster, Aaron
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : 2413 - 2426
  • [3] Automatic segmentation of prostate boundaries in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging
    Liu, HS
    Cheng, G
    Rubens, DB
    Strang, J
    Liao, L
    Brasacchio, R
    Messing, E
    Yu, Y
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 1-3, 2002, 4684 : 412 - 423
  • [4] Zonal segmentation in transrectal ultrasound images of the prostate through deep learning
    van Sloun, R. J. G.
    Wildeboer, R. R.
    Postema, A. W.
    Mannaerts, C. K.
    Gayet, M.
    Wijkstra, H.
    Mischi, M.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2018,
  • [5] Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Hirahara, Naoki
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Iwata, Tsuyoshi
    Kamoi, Kazumi
    Okihara, Koji
    Ito, Hirotoshi
    Nishimura, Tsunehiko
    Miki, Tsuneharu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (10) : 890 - 893
  • [6] Fully Automated Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion via a Probabilistic Registration Metric
    Sparks, Rachel
    Bloch, B. Nicolas
    Feleppa, Ernest
    Barratt, Dean
    Madabhushi, Anant
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2013, 8671
  • [7] 3-Dimensional Elastic Registration System of Prostate Biopsy Location by Real-Time 3-Dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound Guidance With Magnetic Resonance/Transrectal Ultrasound Image Fusion
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Palmer, Suzanne
    Valencerina, Samuel
    Gross, Mitchell
    Abreu, Andre L.
    Aron, Monish
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (03) : 1080 - 1086
  • [8] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy: a comparison with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Silecchia, G.
    Falagario, U.
    Sanguedolce, F.
    Macarini, L.
    Autorino, R.
    Cormio, L.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2018, 66 (04): : 200 - 204
  • [9] Manually controlled targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: An early experience
    Shoji, Sunao
    Hiraiwa, Shinichiro
    Endo, Jun
    Hashida, Kazunobu
    Tomonaga, Tetsuro
    Nakano, Mayura
    Sugiyama, Tomoko
    Tajiri, Takuma
    Terachi, Toshiro
    Uchida, Toyoaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [10] The Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies with Conventional Transrectal Biopsies in Prostate Cancer Detection
    Baba, Dursun
    Balik, Ahmet Yildirim
    Yuksel, Alpaslan
    Senoglu, Yusuf
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 (04): : 210 - 214