Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste

被引:248
|
作者
Kim, Jung Kon
Oh, Baek Rock
Chun, Young Nam
Kim, Si Wouk
机构
[1] Chosun Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Team Biohydrogen Prod BK21, Kwangju 501759, South Korea
[2] Chosun Univ, Dept Bio Mat Engn, Kwangju 501759, South Korea
关键词
anaerobic digestion; methane; temperature effect; organic waste; bioenergy;
D O I
10.1263/jbb.102.328
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A modified three-stage methane fermentation system was developed to digest food waste efficiently. This system consisted of three stages: semianaerobic hydrolysis, anaerobic acidogenesis and strictly anaerobic methanogenesis. In this study, we examined the effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the methanogenesis. Operation temperature was adjusted from 30 degrees C to 55 degrees C, and the HRTs ranged from 8 to 12 d. The rate of soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) removal correlated with digestion time according to the first-order kinetic model developed by Gran et al. [Water Res., 9, 637-642 (1975)]. With liquor food waste, thermophilic digesters showed a higher rate of sCOD removal than mesophilic digesters. The rates of biogas and methane production by thermophilic digesters were higher than those by mesophilic digesters regardless of HRT. Although maximum biogas production occurred when an HRT of 10 d was used, the methane yield was the highest in the reactor when an HRT of 12 d was used (223 l CH4/kg sCOD(degraded)). However, digestion stability decreased when an HRT of 8 d was used. The concentration of NH3-N generated in this experiment did not inhibit anaerobic digestion.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 332
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of organic loading rate and temperature fluctuation on the microbial community and performance of anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Yu, Qin
    Feng, Lei
    Zhen, Xiaofei
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (11) : 13176 - 13187
  • [42] Biochar enhanced methane yield on anaerobic digestion of shell waste and the synergistic effects of anaerobic co-digestion of shell and food waste
    Xu, Shuai
    Bu, Jie
    Li, Changtian
    Tiong, Yong Wei
    Sharma, Pooja
    Liu, Kangzhen
    Jin, Chenxi
    Ma, Chunyang
    Tong, Yen Wah
    FUEL, 2024, 357
  • [43] Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion
    Zhang, Ruihong
    El-Mashad, Hamed M.
    Hartman, Karl
    Wang, Fengyu
    Liu, Guangqing
    Choate, Chris
    Gamble, Paul
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (04) : 929 - 935
  • [44] Food Waste Valorization Based on Anaerobic Digestion
    George Lytras
    Chris Lytras
    Dimitrios Mathioudakis
    Konstantina Papadopoulou
    Gerasimos Lyberatos
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2021, 12 : 1677 - 1697
  • [45] Anaerobic digestion of food waste - Challenges and opportunities
    Xu, Fuqing
    Li, Yangyang
    Ge, Xumeng
    Yang, Liangcheng
    Li, Yebo
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 247 : 1047 - 1058
  • [46] Anaerobic digestion of food waste using yeast
    Suwannarat, Jutarat
    Ritchie, Raymond J.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 42 : 61 - 66
  • [47] Influence of ammonia in the anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Yirong, Chaowana
    Zhang, Wei
    Heaven, Sonia
    Banks, Charles J.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (05): : 5131 - 5142
  • [48] Anaerobic digestion of autoclaved and untreated food waste
    Tampio, Elina
    Ervasti, Satu
    Paavola, Teija
    Heaven, Sonia
    Banks, Charles
    Rintala, Jukka
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (02) : 370 - 377
  • [49] Food Waste Valorization Based on Anaerobic Digestion
    Lytras, George
    Lytras, Chris
    Mathioudakis, Dimitrios
    Papadopoulou, Konstantina
    Lyberatos, Gerasimos
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2021, 12 (04) : 1677 - 1697
  • [50] Effect of temperature on biogas production from food waste through anaerobic digestion
    Paramaguru, G.
    Kannan, M.
    Senthilkumar, N.
    Lawrence, P.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 85 : 68 - 72