Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Improves Physical Function and Fatigue in Mild and Moderate Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Consecutive Randomized Controlled Trial of Standard and Short Interventions

被引:21
作者
Gotaas, Merethe Eide [1 ,2 ]
Stiles, Tore C. [3 ]
Bjorngaard, Johan Hakon [4 ,5 ]
Borchgrevink, Petter C. [1 ,2 ]
Fors, Egil A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, Trondheim, Norway
[2] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Natl Competence Ctr Complex Symptom Disorders, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Psychol, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Nord Univ, Fac Nursing & Hlth Sci, Levanger, Norway
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
CFS; chronic fatigue syndrome; CBT; fatigue; physical function; myalgic encephalitis; MYALGIC ENCEPHALOMYELITIS; HEALTH SURVEY; DEFINITIONS; DISORDER; EFFICACY; VALIDITY; ENGLAND; ANXIETY; ME/CFS; SF-36;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2021.580924
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: To study whether standard cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and a shorter, interpersonal oriented cognitive behavioral therapy (I-CBT) can improve physical function and fatigue in patients diagnosed with mild to moderate chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a multidisciplinary fatigue clinic. Design: Consecutively 236 participants 18-62 years old meeting the Centre of Decease Control, CDC 1994 criteria, with a subsample also fulfilling the Canadian criteria for CFS, were randomly allocated to one of three groups. Two intervention groups received either 16 weeks of standard CBT or 8 weeks of I-CBT vs. a waiting-list control group (WLC). Primary outcome was the subscale Physical Function (PF) from SF-36 (0-100). Secondary outcome was amongst others fatigue measured by Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ) (0-33). Outcomes were repeatedly measured up to 52 weeks from baseline. Results: The additional effect relative to baseline at post-intervention for SF-36 physical function was 14.2 (95% CI 7.9-20.4 p < 0.001) points higher for standard CBT and 6.8 (0.5-13.2 p = 0.036) points higher for I-CBT compared with the control group. The additional effect relative to baseline at post-intervention for fatigue was 5.9 (95% CI 0.5-10.5 p = 0.03) points lower for standard CBT compared with the control group but did not differ substantially for I-CBT 4.8 (95% CI -0.4 to 9.9 p = 0.07). The positive change in physical function persisted at 1-year follow-up for both treatment groups, and for standard CBT also in fatigue. The two intervention groups did not differ significantly in self-reported physical function and fatigue at the 1-year follow-up. No serious adverse reactions were recorded in any of the groups during the trial period. Interpretation: A 16-week standard, individual CBT intervention improves physical function and fatigue in CFS outpatients with mild to moderate disease. A shorter 8-week I-CBT program improves physical function. Both treatments are safe, and the effect persist 1 year after baseline.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Physical activity patterns among children and adolescents with mild-to-moderate chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis
    Solomon-Moore, Emma
    Jago, Russell
    Beasant, Lucy
    Brigden, Amberly
    Crawley, Esther
    BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2019, 3 (01)
  • [42] Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for People with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Still Experiencing Excessive Fatigue after Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: A Pilot Randomized Study
    Rimes, Katharine A.
    Wingrove, Janet
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2013, 20 (02) : 107 - 117
  • [43] Implementing a minimal intervention for chronic fatigue syndrome in a mental health centre: a randomized controlled trial
    Tummers, M.
    Knoop, H.
    van Dam, A.
    Bleijenberg, G.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (10) : 2205 - 2215
  • [44] The effects of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia on cognitive function: a randomized controlled trial
    Kyle, Simon D.
    Hurry, Madeleine E. D.
    Emsley, Richard
    Marsden, Antonia
    Omlin, Ximena
    Juss, Amender
    Spiegelhalder, Kai
    Bisdounis, Lampros
    Luik, Annemarie, I
    Espie, Colin A.
    Sexton, Claire E.
    SLEEP, 2020, 43 (09) : 1 - 12
  • [45] Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Integrated in Routine Clinical Care: Implementation Study
    Worm-Smeitink, Margreet
    van Dam, Arno
    van Es, Saskia
    van der Vaart, Rosalie
    Evers, Andrea
    Wensing, Michel
    Knoop, Hans
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (10)
  • [46] Impact and mechanisms of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia on fatigue among cancer survivors: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
    Greeley, Krista M.
    Rash, Joshua
    Tulk, Joshua
    Savard, Josee
    Seal, Melanie
    Urquhart, Robin
    Thoms, John
    Laing, Kara
    Fawcett, Emily
    Garland, Sheila N.
    SLEEP, 2025,
  • [47] Randomized Controlled Trial of a Telephone-Delivered Physical Activity and Fatigue Self-management Interventions in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis
    Plow, Matthew
    Finlayson, Marcia
    Liu, Jintao
    Motl, Robert W.
    Bethoux, Francois
    Sattar, Abdus
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 100 (11): : 2006 - 2014
  • [48] Biofeedback and cognitive behavioral therapy for Egyptian adolescents suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome
    Al-Haggar, Mohammad S.
    Al-Naggar, Zienab A.
    Abdel-Salam, Mohammad A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2006, 4 (03) : 161 - 169
  • [49] How does cognitive behaviour therapy reduce fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome? The role of physical activity
    Wiborg, J. F.
    Knoop, H.
    Stulemeijer, M.
    Prins, J. B.
    Bleijenberg, G.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (08) : 1281 - 1287
  • [50] Efficacy of web-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial
    Janse, A.
    Worm-Smeitink, M.
    Bleijenberg, G.
    Donders, R.
    Knoop, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 212 (02) : 112 - 118