New treatment strategy for endometriosis using progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dienogest: A prospective cohort study, comparison of dienogest versus dydrogesterone

被引:15
作者
Iwami, Nanako [1 ]
Kawamata, Miho [1 ]
Ozawa, Naoko [1 ]
Yamamoto, Takahiro [1 ]
Watanabe, Eri [1 ]
Mizuuchi, Masahito [1 ]
Moriwaka, Osamu [1 ]
Kamiya, Hirobumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kamiya Ladies Clin, Chuo Ku, 2-1,Nishi 2,Kita 3, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600003, Japan
关键词
Progestin primed ovarian stimulation; Dienogest; Dydrogesterone; Endometriosis; Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; THERAPY; AGONIST; WOMEN; EXPRESSION; OVULATION; SURGERY; ACETATE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.repbio.2020.100470
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Dienogest (DNG) is an oral progestin effective for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis, such as reduction of endometrial lesion and control of pain intensity. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is a new controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, and several reports have shown that dydrogesterone (DYG) is an appropriate progestin for PPOS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DNG in patients undergoing PPOS during COH in comparison with DYG. This was a prospective, cohort, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial of 150 women with endometriosis undergoing assisted reproductive technology between February 2018 and May 2020 at the single fertility center. The assignment to each protocol was based on the optimal treatment for each patient. Patients taking DNG 2 mg continuously were assigned in the DNG group(n = 73). The other patients were allocated in DYG group (n = 77). All viable embryos were cryopreserved for subsequent transfer. The main outcome measures were the mature oocyte and fertilization rates. During this study, no premature LH surge was detected. A smaller number of oocytes were retrieved in the DNG group than in the DYG group (6.18 +/- 3.60 vs. 9.85 +/- 5.77); however, the rate of mature oocytes was significantly higher in the DNG group than in the DYG group (89.1 % vs. 78.9 %). The fertilization rate was comparable between two groups. Therefore, patients taking DNG for PPOS can continue endometriosis treatment and obtain good-quality embryos during COH. Further prospective randomized-controlled trial should be performed to confirm of this novel strategy of DNG. (C) 2020 Society for Biology of Reproduction & the Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences in Olsztyn. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   Euploidy rate and pregnancy outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles using progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol [J].
Tan, Hu ;
Huang, Li ;
Liu, Wenjuan ;
Yan, Jin ;
Li, Li ;
Wang, Yujiang ;
Huang, Yuqiang ;
Xiao, Zonghui ;
Liu, Fenghua ;
Zhang, Xiqian .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2025, 23 (01)
[32]   Effect of letrozole cotreatment in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation on IVF/ICSI outcomes in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 poor responders: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Wang, Luyao ;
Xie, Jiaxin ;
Chu, Yifan ;
Chen, Jiayun ;
Jin, Lei ;
Yue, Jing .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 30 (01)
[33]   Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Versus Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients With Asynchronous Follicular Development During Controlled Ovulation Stimulation: A Retrospective Study [J].
Dong, Mei ;
Sun, Li ;
Huang, Li ;
Wang, Fang ;
Zhang, Xiqian ;
Liu, Fenghua .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
[34]   Optimal Ovulation Trigger-Oocyte Pickup Interval in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching [J].
Shen, Xi ;
Long, Hui ;
Guo, Wenya ;
Gao, Hongyuan ;
Cai, Renfei ;
Jin, Wei ;
Yan, Zhiguang ;
Zhang, Shaozhen ;
Wang, Yun ;
Lyu, Qifeng ;
Wang, Li ;
Kuang, Yanping .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 10
[35]   Comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation regimen and antagonist regimen in women aged 35 years or older with diminished ovarian reserve: A propensity score-matched study [J].
Wang, Mohan ;
Li, Linlin ;
Zhu, Haibo ;
Wang, Ruixue ;
Liu, Ruizhi ;
Zhang, Han .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 167 (01) :162-168
[36]   Dydrogesterone versus medroxyprogesterone acetate co-treatment ovarian stimulation for IVF: a matched cohort study of 236 freeze-all-IVF cycles [J].
Ozgur, Kemal ;
Berkkanoglu, Murat ;
Bulut, Hasan ;
Tore, Hande ;
Donmez, Levent ;
Coetzee, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (02) :268-275
[37]   Comparison of treatment outcomes following ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination in minimal or mild endometriosis versus unexplained infertility: A retrospective cohort study [J].
Sarkar, Sharmistha ;
Joseph, Treasa ;
Yadav, Bijesh ;
Kamath, Mohan Shashikant ;
Kunjummen, Aleyamma Thayparmbil .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (03) :272-277
[38]   Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial [J].
Wang, Ningling ;
Zhu, Qianqian ;
Ma, Meng ;
Liang, Zhou ;
Tao, Yu ;
Wang, Yun ;
Kuang, Yanping .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12)