New treatment strategy for endometriosis using progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dienogest: A prospective cohort study, comparison of dienogest versus dydrogesterone

被引:15
作者
Iwami, Nanako [1 ]
Kawamata, Miho [1 ]
Ozawa, Naoko [1 ]
Yamamoto, Takahiro [1 ]
Watanabe, Eri [1 ]
Mizuuchi, Masahito [1 ]
Moriwaka, Osamu [1 ]
Kamiya, Hirobumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kamiya Ladies Clin, Chuo Ku, 2-1,Nishi 2,Kita 3, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600003, Japan
关键词
Progestin primed ovarian stimulation; Dienogest; Dydrogesterone; Endometriosis; Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; THERAPY; AGONIST; WOMEN; EXPRESSION; OVULATION; SURGERY; ACETATE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.repbio.2020.100470
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Dienogest (DNG) is an oral progestin effective for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis, such as reduction of endometrial lesion and control of pain intensity. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is a new controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, and several reports have shown that dydrogesterone (DYG) is an appropriate progestin for PPOS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DNG in patients undergoing PPOS during COH in comparison with DYG. This was a prospective, cohort, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial of 150 women with endometriosis undergoing assisted reproductive technology between February 2018 and May 2020 at the single fertility center. The assignment to each protocol was based on the optimal treatment for each patient. Patients taking DNG 2 mg continuously were assigned in the DNG group(n = 73). The other patients were allocated in DYG group (n = 77). All viable embryos were cryopreserved for subsequent transfer. The main outcome measures were the mature oocyte and fertilization rates. During this study, no premature LH surge was detected. A smaller number of oocytes were retrieved in the DNG group than in the DYG group (6.18 +/- 3.60 vs. 9.85 +/- 5.77); however, the rate of mature oocytes was significantly higher in the DNG group than in the DYG group (89.1 % vs. 78.9 %). The fertilization rate was comparable between two groups. Therefore, patients taking DNG for PPOS can continue endometriosis treatment and obtain good-quality embryos during COH. Further prospective randomized-controlled trial should be performed to confirm of this novel strategy of DNG. (C) 2020 Society for Biology of Reproduction & the Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences in Olsztyn. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Comparison of the neonatal outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and flexible GnRH antagonist protocols: a propensity score-matched cohort study [J].
Du, Mingze ;
Zhang, Junwei ;
Ren, Bingnan ;
Guan, Yichun .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
[22]   Granulosa cells apoptosis and follicular fluid hormones: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocols [J].
Li, Xiaolan ;
Zhang, Xiaoli ;
Cai, Jiawei ;
Pang, Jiahui ;
Sun, Peng ;
Chen, Jianhui ;
Wang, Meng ;
Liang, Xiaoyan .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (07) :609-613
[23]   Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with letrozole using different doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Li, Hai-long ;
Shen, Bei-bei ;
He, Zheng-liang ;
Wang, Hai-li ;
Sun, Zhi-feng .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
[24]   Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates between Flexible and Conventional Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Ovarian Response Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Cohort Study [J].
Chen, Ying ;
Chu, Yifan ;
Yao, Wen ;
Wang, Luyao ;
Zeng, Wanjiang ;
Yue, Jing .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (18)
[25]   Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation vs mild stimulation in women with advanced age above 40: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Qian Peng ;
Xiang Cao ;
Jing Wang ;
Lin Wang ;
Jun Xu ;
Xiaowei Ji ;
Suying Liu ;
Jin Zhu ;
Xi Dong .
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 17
[26]   Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes of progestin-primed vs. antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients with poor ovarian response: a retrospective study [J].
Shi, Zuoping ;
Zhao, Wenhui ;
Wu, Xueqing ;
Bi, Xingyu .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 40 (01)
[27]   Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus Mild Stimulation Protocol in Advanced Age Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing Their First In Vitro Fertilization Cycle: A Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Tu, Xiaoyu ;
You, Bingbing ;
Jing, Miaomiao ;
Lin, Chenxi ;
Zhang, Runju .
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 12
[28]   Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response [J].
Zhuo-ni Xiao ;
Jia-li Peng ;
Jing Yang ;
Wang-ming Xu .
Current Medical Science, 2019, 39 :431-436
[29]   Comparison of an HCG-only trigger versus dual trigger for final oocyte maturation in a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol [J].
Li, Qian ;
Li, Xiaolan ;
Li, Tingting ;
Xu, Linan ;
Wang, Yanfang ;
Huang, Rui .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (06) :1176-1181
[30]   Comparable Pregnancy Loss and Neonatal Birthweights in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles Using Vitrified Embryos from Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation and GnRH Analogue Protocols: A Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Chai, Weiran ;
Liao, Maokun ;
Feng, Guang'en ;
Wei, Mengjie ;
Shi, Wentao ;
Wang, Yun ;
Chen, Qiuju .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (20)