LCA and Exergo-Environmental Evaluation of a Combined Heat and Power Double-Flash Geothermal Power Plant

被引:19
作者
Colucci, Vitantonio [1 ]
Manfrida, Giampaolo [1 ]
Mendecka, Barbara [2 ]
Talluri, Lorenzo [1 ]
Zuffi, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Ind Engn, I-50134 Florence, FI, Italy
[2] Univ Tuscia, Dept Econ Engn Soc & Business Org, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
geothermal energy; district heating system; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Life cycle environmental impacts; comparison of LCIA methods; exergo-environmental analysis; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; STORAGE; CARBON;
D O I
10.3390/su13041935
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study deals with the life cycle assessment (LCA) and an exergo-environmental analysis (EEvA) of the geothermal Power Plant of Hellisheioi (Iceland), a combined heat and power double flash plant, with an installed power of 303.3 MW for electricity and 133 MW for hot water. LCA approach is used to evaluate and analyse the environmental performance at the power plant global level. A more in-depth study is developed, at the power plant components level, through EEvA. The analysis employs existing published data with a realignment of the inventory to the latest data resource and compares the life cycle impacts of three methods (ILCD 2011 Midpoint, ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint-Endpoint, and CML-IA Baseline) for two different scenarios. In scenario 1, any emission abatement system is considered. In scenario 2, re-injection of CO2 and H2S is accounted for. The analysis identifies some major hot spots for the environmental power plant impacts, like acidification, particulate matter formation, ecosystem, and human toxicity, mainly caused by some specific sources. Finally, an exergo-environmental analysis allows indicating the wells as significant contributors of the environmental impact rate associated with the construction, Operation & Maintenance, and end of life stages and the HP condenser as the component with the highest environmental cost rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:22
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ECOINVENT DATABASE 3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INSTITUDE ENV SCI, V20, P709
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, UNISIM DESIGN R471
[4]   Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization [J].
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
Baldinelli, Giorgio ;
D'Alessandro, Francesco ;
Scrucca, Flavio .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1113-1122
[5]   Environmental assessment of a binary geothermal sourced power plant accompanied by exergy analysis [J].
Basogul, Yusuf .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 195 :492-501
[6]   Life Cycle Analysis of a Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison of the Environmental Performance with Other Renewable Energy Systems [J].
Basosi, Riccardo ;
Bonciani, Roberto ;
Frosali, Dario ;
Manfrida, Giampaolo ;
Parisi, Maria Laura ;
Sansone, Franco .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (07) :1-29
[7]  
Castellani V., 2018, Supporting information to the characterisation factors of recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods: new methods and differences with ILCD
[8]   Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system [J].
Cidade Cavalcanti, Eduardo Jose .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :507-519
[9]   CarbFix2: CO2 and H2S mineralization during 3.5 years of continuous injection into basaltic rocks at more than 250 °C [J].
Clark, Deirdre E. ;
Oelkers, Eric H. ;
Gunnarsson, Ingvi ;
Sigfusson, Bergur ;
Snaebjornsdottir, Sandra O. ;
Aradottir, Edda S. ;
Gislason, Sigurdur R. .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2020, 279 :45-66
[10]  
DiPippo R., 2016, Geothermal Power Generation: Developments and Innovation