Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system

被引:74
作者
Epstein, Jonathan, I [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, 401N Broadway St,Weinberg Bldg,Room 2242, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
关键词
GLEASON PATTERN 5; ISUP CONSENSUS-CONFERENCE; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIATION; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; DISEASE-SPECIFIC DEATH; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; MUCINOUS ADENOCARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; GROUPING SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.2017.133
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
This review article will cover the evolution of grading of prostate cancer from the original Gleason system in the 1960-1970s to a more patient-centric grading system proposed in 2013 from a group at Johns Hopkins Hospital, validated in 2014 by a large multi-institutional study, and subsequently accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO), College of American Pathology (CAP), and the AJCC TNM system. Covered topics include: (1) historical background; (2) 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Grading Conferences; (3) Description of Gleason patterns; (4) new approaches to display Gleason grades; (5) grading variants and variations of acinar adenocarcinoma; (6) reporting rules for Gleason grading reporting secondary patterns of higher grade when present to a limited extent; (7) reporting secondary patterns of lower grade when present to a limited extent; (8) reporting percentage pattern 4; (9) general applications of the Gleason grading system; (10) needle biopsy with different cores showing different grades; (11) radical prostatectomy specimens with separate tumor nodules; and (12) a new grading system for prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:S47 / S63
页数:17
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [81] Do Adenocarcinomas of the Prostate With Gleason Score (GS) ≤ 6 Have the Potential to Metastasize to Lymph Nodes?
    Ross, Hillary M.
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Simko, Jeffry P.
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 36 (09) : 1346 - 1352
  • [82] GLEASON PATTERN 5 IS THE GREATEST RISK FACTOR FOR CLINICAL FAILURE AND DEATH FROM PROSTATE CANCER AFTER DOSE-ESCALATED RADIATION THERAPY AND HORMONAL ABLATION
    Sabolch, Aaron
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Daignault-Newton, Stephanie
    Halverson, Schuyler
    Blas, Kevin
    Phelps, Laura
    Olson, Karin B.
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04): : E351 - E360
  • [83] Interobserver Reproducibility of Percent Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Prostate Biopsies
    Sadimin, Evita T.
    Khani, Francesca
    Diolombi, Mairo
    Meliti, Abdelrazak
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (12) : 1686 - 1692
  • [84] The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Delahunt, Brett
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Duffy, David
    LeFevre, Ian
    Johannsen, Shulammite
    Egevad, Lars
    Yaxley, John
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) : 515 - 519
  • [85] Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens
    Sauter, Guido
    Steurer, Stefan
    Clauditz, Till Sebastian
    Krech, Till
    Wittmer, Corinna
    Lutz, Florian
    Lennartz, Maximilian
    Janssen, Tim
    Hakimi, Nayira
    Simon, Ronald
    von Petersdorff-Campen, Mareike
    Jacobsen, Frank
    von Loga, Katharina
    Wilczak, Waldemar
    Minner, Sarah
    Tsourlakis, Maria Christina
    Chirico, Viktoria
    Haese, Alexander
    Heinzer, Hans
    Beyer, Burkhard
    Graefen, Markus
    Michl, Uwe
    Salomon, Georg
    Steuber, Thomas
    Budaeus, Lars Henrik
    Hekeler, Elena
    Malsy-Mink, Julia
    Kutzera, Sven
    Fraune, Christoph
    Goebel, Cosima
    Huland, Hartwig
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (04) : 592 - 598
  • [86] Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma
    Sehdev, AES
    Pan, CC
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (05) : 494 - 499
  • [87] Tertiary gleason pattern 5 in gleason 7 prostate cancer predicts pathological stage and biochemical recurrence
    Sim, Hong Gee
    Telesca, Donatello
    Culp, Stephen H.
    Ellis, William J.
    Lange, Paul H.
    True, Lawrence D.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (05) : 1775 - 1779
  • [88] Independent validation of the prognostic capacity of the ISUP prostate cancer grade grouping system for radiation treated patients with long-term follow-up
    Spratt, D. E.
    Jackson, W. C.
    Abugharib, A.
    Tomlins, S. A.
    Dess, R. T.
    Soni, P. D.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Zhao, S. G.
    Cole, A. I.
    Zumsteg, Z. S.
    Sandler, H.
    Hamstra, D.
    Hearn, J. W.
    Palapattu, G.
    Mehra, R.
    Morgan, T. M.
    Feng, F. Y.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2016, 19 (03) : 292 - 297
  • [89] CONTINUED BENEFIT TO ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH DOSE-ESCALATED RADIATION THERAPY ACROSS MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS OF HIGH-RISK DISEASE
    Stenmark, Matthew H.
    Blas, Kevin
    Halverson, Schuyler
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04): : E335 - E344
  • [90] Disease-specific survival following the brachytherapy management of prostate cancer
    Stock, RG
    Cesaretti, JA
    Stone, NN
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (03): : 810 - 816