Comparing the sensitivity of soil invertebrates to pesticides with that of Eisenia fetida

被引:45
作者
Daam, Michiel A. [1 ]
Leitao, Sara [1 ]
Cerejeira, Maria Jose [1 ]
Paulo Sousa, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Super Agron, P-1349017 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Dep Life Sci, IMAR CMA, P-3004517 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Environmental risk assessment; Soil invertebrates; Eisenia fetida; Relative tolerance; Terrestrial ecotoxicology; LIFE-HISTORY STRATEGY; SPECIES-SENSITIVITY; TOXICITY; CLASSIFICATION; CARBENDAZIM; EARTHWORMS; ENDOSULFAN; NEMATODES; RESPONSES; CADMIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.032
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The sole routine testing of the standard earthworm Eisenia fetida for the terrestrial risk assessment of pesticides has been under much debate since other soil invertebrates may be more sensitive than this standard test species. However, the very low availability of laboratory toxicity data for taxa other than E. fetida has greatly hampered sensitivity comparisons. In the present study, the relative tolerance (T-rel) approach was used to enable comparing toxicity thresholds obtained from the US-EPA ECOTOX database, for main terrestrial taxonomic groups and pesticidal types of action (insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and other) separately. Analyses confirmed previously reported lower and higher sensitivity of collembolans to fungicides and insecticides, respectively. However, various other discrepancies in susceptibility relative to E. fetida were encountered as indicated by species sensitivity distributions and/or calculated 95% confidence intervals of T-rel values. Arachnids and isopods were found to be more sensitive to insecticides, and nematodes to fungicides, as compared to E. fetida. Implications of study findings for the terrestrial risk assessment of pesticides are discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1047
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], OFF J EUR COMMU L
  • [2] Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances
    Baird, Donald J.
    Van den Brink, Paul J.
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2007, 67 (02) : 296 - 301
  • [3] Boyd W.A., 2001, Environ. Toxicol. Risk Assess, V10, P223
  • [4] Brock Theo C. M., 2008, P223
  • [5] Campbell E., 2000, BurrliOZ: a computer program for calculating toxicant trigger values for the ANZECC and ARMCANZ water quality guidelines
  • [6] Optimization of culture conditions of Porcellio dilatatus (Crustacea: Isopoda) for laboratory test development
    Caseiro, I
    Sousa, JP
    Santos, S
    Nogueira, AJA
    Soares, AMVM
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2000, 47 (03) : 285 - 291
  • [7] IMPROVING ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AREA: SELECTION OF REFERENCE SOILS AND EVALUATING THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL PROPERTIES ON AVOIDANCE AND REPRODUCTION OF TWO OLIGOCHAETE SPECIES
    Chelinho, Sonia
    Domene, Xavier
    Campana, Paolo
    Natal-da-Luz, Tiago
    Scheffczyk, Adam
    Roembke, Joerg
    Andres, Pilar
    Sousa, Jost Paulo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2011, 30 (05) : 1050 - 1058
  • [8] Impact of the fungicide carbendazim in freshwater microcosms. I. Water quality, breakdown of particulate organic matter and responses of macroinvertebrates
    Cuppen, JGM
    Van den Brink, PJ
    Camps, E
    Uil, KF
    Brock, TCM
    [J]. AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 48 (2-3) : 233 - 250
  • [9] Comparison of fate and ecological effects of the herbicide linuron in freshwater model ecosystems between tropical and temperate regions
    Daam, Michiel A.
    Van den Brink, Paul J.
    Nogueira, Antonio J. A.
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2009, 72 (02) : 424 - 433
  • [10] Does the actual standard of 0.1 μg/L overestimate or underestimate the risk of plant protection products to groundwater ecosystems?
    Daam, Michiel A.
    Silva, Emilia
    Leitao, Sara
    Trindade, Manuel J.
    Cerejeira, Maria Jose
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2010, 73 (05) : 750 - 756