Induction of labour in low-resource settings

被引:3
作者
Ngene, Nnabuike Chibuoke [1 ,2 ]
Moodley, Jagidesa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Clin Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Leratong Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Krugersdorp, Gauteng Provinc, South Africa
[3] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Clin Med, Womens Hlth & HIV Res Grp,Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durban, South Africa
关键词
Cycle of induction of labour; HIV in pregnancy; Induction of labour; Outpatient induction; Quality improvement project; ADVERSE BIRTH OUTCOMES; ORAL MISOPROSTOL; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; CERVICAL DILATATION; POOR PREDICTOR; TERM; MULTICENTER; MEMBRANES; RUPTURE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Due to the disparity in resource availability between low-and high resource settings, practice recommendations relevant to high income countries are not always relevant and often need to be adapted to low-resource settings. The adaptation applies to induction of labour (IOL) which is an obstetric procedure that deserves special attention because it involves the initiation of a process that requires regular and frequent monitoring of the mother and foetus by experienced healthcare professionals. Lack of problem recognition and/or substandard care during IOL may result in harm with long-term sequelae. In this article, the authors discuss unique challenges such as insufficient resources (including staff, midwives, doctors, equipment, and medications) that result in occasional inadequate patient monitoring and/or delayed interventions during IOL in low-resource settings. We also discuss modifications in indications and methods for IOL, issues related to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections, the feasibility of outpatient induction, clinical protocols and a minimum dataset for quality improvement projects. Overall, the desire to achieve a vaginal birth with IOL should not cloud the necessity to observe the required safety measures and implement necessary interventions; given that childbirth practices are the major determinants of pregnancy outcomes and patient satisfaction. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 109
页数:20
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [61] Avoiding myopia in assessing elective 39-week inductions
    Metcalf, Thomas H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (05) : 555 - 555
  • [62] Moodley J, 2019, S Afr Med J, V109, P12723
  • [63] FIGO's updated recommendations for misoprostol used alone in gynecology and obstetrics
    Morris, Jessica L.
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Dabash, Rasha
    Weeks, Andrew
    Faundes, Anibal
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Castleman, Laura
    Kim, Caron
    Ho, Pak Chung
    Visser, Gerard H. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2017, 138 (03) : 363 - 366
  • [64] Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial
    Morris, Jonathan M.
    Roberts, Christine L.
    Bowen, Jennifer R.
    Patterson, Jillian A.
    Bond, Diana M.
    Algert, Charles S.
    Thornton, Jim G.
    Crowther, Caroline A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 387 (10017) : 444 - 452
  • [65] Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study
    Morris, Marilyn
    Bolnga, John W.
    Verave, Ovoi
    Aipit, Jimmy
    Rero, Allanie
    Laman, Moses
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [66] The MisoPROM study: A multicenter randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term
    Mozurkewich, E
    Horrocks, J
    Daley, S
    Von Oeyen, P
    Halvorson, M
    Johnson, M
    Zaretsky, M
    Tehranifar, M
    Bayer-Zwirello, L
    Robichaux, A
    Droste, S
    Turner, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1026 - 1030
  • [67] Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Mundle, Shuchita
    Bracken, Hillary
    Khedikar, Vaishali
    Mulik, Jayashree
    Faragher, Brian
    Easterling, Thomas
    Leigh, Simon
    Granby, Paul
    Haycox, Alan
    Turner, Mark A.
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Weeks, Andrew D.
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 390 (10095) : 669 - 680
  • [68] Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Murthy, Shruti
    Godinho, Myron Anthony
    Guddattu, Vasudeva
    Edward, Leslie
    Lewis, Simon
    Nair, N. Sreekumaran
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04):
  • [69] National Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Death, 2020, SAV MOTH BAB 2017 20
  • [70] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2008, IND LAB CLIN GUID 70