Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension

被引:314
作者
Delgado, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
Vargas, Cristina [2 ]
Ackerman, Rakefet [3 ]
Salmeron, Ladislao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, ERI Lectura, Avd Blasco Ibanez 21, Valencia 46010, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Dept Dev & Educ Psychol, Avd Blasco Ibanez 21, Valencia 46010, Spain
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Ind Engn & Management, IL-3200003 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Reading comprehension; Reading media differences; Digital-based reading; Paper-based reading; Meta-analysis; PAPER-AND-PENCIL; COGNITIVE LOAD; SCREEN; COMPUTER; TEXTS; COMPARABILITY; EQUIVALENCE; PREFERENCES; INFERIORITY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
With the increasing dominance of digital reading over paper reading, gaining understanding of the effects of the medium on reading comprehension has become critical. However, results from research comparing learning outcomes across printed and digital media are mixed, making conclusions difficult to reach. In the current meta-analysis, we examined research in recent years (2000-2017), comparing the reading of comparable texts on paper and on digital devices. We included studies with between-participants (n = 38) and within-participants designs (n = 16) involving 171,055 participants. Both designs yielded the same advantage of paper over digital reading (Hedge's g = -0.21;. d(c) = -0.21). Analyses revealed three significant moderators: (1) time frame: the paper-based reading advantage increased in time-constrained reading compared to self-paced reading; (2) text genre: the paper-based reading advantage was consistent across studies using informational texts, or a mix of informational and narrative texts, but not on those using only narrative texts; (3) publication year: the advantage of paper-based reading increased over the years. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 38
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure [J].
Ackerman, Rakefet ;
Lauterman, Tirza .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 28 (05) :1816-1828
[2]   Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen Versus on Paper [J].
Ackerman, Rakefet ;
Goldsmith, Morris .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2011, 17 (01) :18-32
[3]   Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis [J].
Annisette, Logan E. ;
Lafreniere, Kathryn D. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 115 :154-158
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, THESIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J TECHNOL LEARN ASSE
[6]  
[Anonymous], MON TRENDS REP 2017
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HDB RES SYNTHESIS ME
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 33 ANN M SOC SCI STU
[9]  
[Anonymous], J TECHNOLOGY LEARNIN
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NORDIC STUDIES ED