The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales: Reference data from a large psychiatric outpatient sample

被引:13
作者
Davies, Gordon [1 ]
Caputi, Peter [2 ]
Skarvelis, Maria [2 ]
Ronan, Nicola [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Grad Sch Med, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Psychol, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
关键词
clinical; counseling psychology; emotion; mood; positive and negative affect; psychological testing and measurement; individual differences; LARGE NONCLINICAL SAMPLE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PERCENTILE RANKS; CLINICAL-SAMPLES; NORMATIVE DATA; TEST-SCORES; DASS; VERSION; VALIDITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1111/ajpy.12069
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The published norms for the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) give results for clinical populations that largely fall in the severe to very severe categories. As a result, within this population, the ability to compare the comparative contributions of the underlying emotional components is reduced. The present study presents results from a large general psychiatric outpatient population and provides percentile norms with confidence intervals for both the original DASS and the shorter 21-item form. It is noted that both forms have high validity but that the correlations between scales are higher than those reported in non-clinical populations. There was little variation between sexes but some variation of results with age with both younger and older cohorts having lower scores except for the Stress scale where there were higher scores in the older group. There is some evidence of a ceiling effect in the Depression and Stress scales. It was noted that nearly a quarter of patient scores fell within the originally defined normal range suggesting that the DASS would not be a particularly sensitive instrument in its previously reported use as a screening instrument for psychiatric illness.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Mood state as a predictor of neuropsychological deficits following cardiac surgery [J].
Andrew, MJ ;
Baker, RA ;
Kneebone, AC ;
Knight, JL .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2000, 48 (06) :537-546
[2]   Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample [J].
Antony, MM ;
Bieling, PJ ;
Cox, BJ ;
Enns, MW ;
Swinson, RP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1998, 10 (02) :176-181
[3]  
Bados A, 2005, PSICOTHEMA, V17, P679
[4]   Preoperative depression and mortality in coronary artery bypass surgery: Preliminary findings [J].
Baker, RA ;
Andrew, MJ ;
Schrader, G ;
Knight, JL .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 71 (03) :139-142
[5]   Family treatment of childhood anxiety: A controlled trial [J].
Barrett, PM ;
Dadds, MR ;
Rapee, RM .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 64 (02) :333-342
[6]   Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples [J].
Brown, TA ;
Chorpita, BF ;
Korotitsch, W ;
Barlow, DH .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (01) :79-89
[7]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scales in depressed and anxious patients [J].
Clara, IP ;
Cox, BJ ;
Enns, MW .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 23 (01) :61-67
[8]   Percentile Norms and Accompanying Interval Estimates from an Australian General Adult Population Sample for Self-Report Mood Scales (BAI, BDI, CRSD, CES-D, DASS, DASS-21, STAI-X, STAI-Y, SRDS, and SRAS) [J].
Crawford, John ;
Cayley, Carol ;
Lovibond, Peter F. ;
Wilson, Peter H. ;
Hartley, Caroline .
AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 46 (01) :3-14
[9]   On percentile norms in neuropsychology: Proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores [J].
Crawford, John R. ;
Garthwaite, Paul H. ;
Slick, Daniel J. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2009, 23 (07) :1173-1195
[10]   PERCENTILES PLEASE: THE CASE FOR EXPRESSING NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST SCORES AND ACCOMPANYING CONFIDENCE LIMITS AS PERCENTILE RANKS [J].
Crawford, John R. ;
Garthwaite, Paul H. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2009, 23 (02) :193-204