Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach

被引:53
作者
Zhao, Weijun [1 ]
Hafeez, Muhammad [2 ]
Maqbool, Adnan [3 ]
Ullah, Sana [4 ]
Sohail, Sidra [5 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, China Ctr Special Econ Zone Res, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Khwaja Fareed Univ Engn & Informat Technol, Dept Management Sci, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
[4] Quaid I Azam Univ, Sch Econ, Islamabad, Pakistan
[5] Pakistan Inst Dev Econ PIDE, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Income inequality; Environmental pollution; BRICS countries; CARBON EMISSIONS; CO2; EMISSIONS; QUALITY EVIDENCE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CHINA; HEALTH; POVERTY; CARE; INSURANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-14209-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With rapid economic growth, BRICS is facing enormous burdens of carbon emission and severe issues of income inequality. However, behind this economic success, the BRICS economies also face few thoughtful challenges to improve environmental quality by catching up the sustainable development goals. Consequently, the existing empirical research is concerned with the dynamic links between income inequality and CO2 emissions by using the novel nonlinear ARDL approach, but small attention has been paid to the BRICS in literature. Therefore, we observed that a negative and positive change in income inequality has positive effect on CO2 emissions in Russia and South Africa in the long run, although a positive change in income inequality has positive effects on CO2 emissions in Brazil, Russia, and China, while a negative change in income inequality has negative effect on CO2 emissions in India, Brazil, and Russia in the short run. Hence, the findings value specific attention from policymakers in BRICS economies.
引用
收藏
页码:51199 / 51209
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Asymmetric macroeconomic determinants of CO2 emission in China and policy approaches [J].
Aslam, Bilal ;
Hu, Jinsong ;
Majeed, Muhammad Tariq ;
Andlib, Zubaria ;
Ullah, Sana .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (31) :41923-41936
[2]   Does income inequality harm the environment?: Empirical evidence from the United States [J].
Baek, Jungho ;
Gweisah, Guankerwon .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 :1434-1437
[3]   Analyzing the relationship between poverty, income inequality, and CO2 emission in Sub-Saharan African countries [J].
Baloch, Muhammad Awais ;
Danish ;
Khan, Salah Ud-Din ;
Ulucak, Zubeyde Senturk ;
Ahmad, Ashfaq .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 740
[4]   Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration [J].
Berthe, Alexandre ;
Elie, Luc .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 116 :191-200
[5]   Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right? [J].
Bowles, S ;
Park, Y .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2005, 115 (507) :F397-F412
[6]   INEQUALITY AS A CAUSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION [J].
BOYCE, JK .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 11 (03) :169-178
[7]  
Boyce JK., 2003, 52 U MASS POL EC RES, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.376921, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.376921]
[8]   Equality and CO2 emissions distribution in climate change integrated assessment modelling [J].
Cantore, Nicola ;
Padilla, Emilio .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (01) :298-313
[9]   Pareto law-based regional inequality analysis of PM2.5 air pollution and economic development in China [J].
Cao, Kai ;
Zhang, Wenting ;
Liu, Shaobo ;
Huang, Bo ;
Huang, Wei .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 252
[10]   Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women's cosmetics [J].
Chao, A ;
Schor, JB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 19 (01) :107-131