Prophylactic antibiotic use in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction

被引:2
作者
Mazari, F. A. K. [1 ]
Wattoo, G. M. [2 ]
Kazzazi, N. H. [2 ]
Kolar, K. M. [2 ]
Olubowale, O. O. [2 ]
Rogers, C. E. [2 ]
Azmy, I. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Princess Anne Hosp, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Doncaster & Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Fdn, Doncaster, England
[3] Chesterfield Royal Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Chesterfield, England
关键词
Mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Implant reconstruction; Acellular dermal matrix; Antibiotics; INFECTION; GUIDELINES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1308/rcsann.2020.7017
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Prophylactic antibiotics are used in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions. However, there are no universally accepted guidelines regarding the best regimen. This retrospective, multicentre study was designed to compare the different prophylactic antibiotic regimens in these patients in three hospitals across two NHS trusts over a five-year period. Methods Case notes and electronic records were reviewed for all patients undergoing acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions between January 2010 and December 2014. Prophylactic antibiotic regimens, duration of use, wound infection, implant loss, seroma and therapeutic antibiotic use was recorded. Patients were divided into groups based on prophylactic antibiotic regimen and actual duration of use. Intergroup analysis was performed using Stata 13.0. Implant loss due to infection was the primary outcome measure. Results A total of 105 patients had 122 breast reconstructions performed over the study period. Four prophylactic antibiotic regimens were identified: single dose (n = 20), three doses (n=17), antibiotics for five-seven days (n=51) and antibiotics until drains removed (n= 32). There was no statistically significant difference (p> 0.05) between the various regimens in implant loss, wound infection, therapeutic antibiotic prescription or seroma rates. Based on the actual duration of prophylactic antibiotics usage, three groups were identified: prophylactic antibiotics given for one day (n= 26), antibiotics for up to one week (n= 76) and for more than one week (n=13). Again, no statistically significant difference was observed in the groups for any outcome measure. Conclusion The study demonstrated no difference in outcomes between different prophylactic antibiotic regimens in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 190
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, 104 SIGN
  • [2] Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Avashia, Yash J.
    Mohan, Raja
    Berhane, ChiChi
    Oeltjen, John C.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (03) : 453 - 461
  • [3] Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Hot Topics, Controversies, and New Directions
    Frey, Jordan D.
    Salibian, Ara A.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Choi, Mihye
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (02) : 404E - 416E
  • [4] Infectious Complications Associated With the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Bilateral Breast Reconstruction
    Hill, Joseph L.
    Wong, Lesley
    Kemper, Pamela
    Buseman, Jason
    Davenport, Daniel L.
    Vasconez, Henry C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 68 (05) : 432 - 434
  • [5] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications Associated With Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Breast Reconstruction
    Ho, Goretti
    Nguyen, T. JoAnna
    Shahabi, Ahva
    Hwang, Brian H.
    Chan, Linda S.
    Wong, Alex K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 68 (04) : 346 - 356
  • [6] IBRAHIM AMS, 2015, PRS GLOB OPEN, V3, DOI DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000148
  • [7] Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England
    Jeevan, Ranjeet
    Cromwell, David A.
    Browne, John P.
    Caddy, Christopher M.
    Pereira, Jerome
    Sheppard, Carmel
    Greenaway, Kimberley
    van der Meulen, Jan H. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (10) : 1333 - 1344
  • [8] Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) assisted breast reconstruction procedures: Joint guidelines from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons
    Martin, L.
    O'Donoghue, J. M.
    Horgan, K.
    Thrush, S.
    Johnson, R.
    Gandhi, A.
    [J]. EJSO, 2013, 39 (05): : 425 - 429
  • [9] Adherence to best practice consensus guidelines for implant-based breast reconstruction: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire survey
    Mylvaganam, Senthurun
    Conroy, Elizabeth J.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Barnes, Nicola L. P.
    Cutress, Ramsey I.
    Gardiner, Matthew D.
    Jain, Abhilash
    Skillman, Joanna M.
    Thrush, Steven
    Whisker, Lisa J.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Potter, Shelley
    Holcombe, Christopher
    [J]. EJSO, 2018, 44 (05): : 708 - 716
  • [10] NICE, 2019, NICE guideline [NG125]