Controlled clinical trials in cystic fibrosis - are we doing better?

被引:8
作者
Briggs, Tracy Ann
Bryant, Mandy
Smyth, Rosalind L.
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Child Hlth, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Cochrane Cyst Fibrosis & Genet Disorders Review G, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
randomised controlled trials; cystic fibrosis; research design;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcf.2005.09.005
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We have previously reported the time trends, design and interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in cystic fibrosis (CF) from 1961 through 1997 [Cheng K, Smyth RL, Motley J, O'Hea U, Ashby D, Randomised controlled trials in cystic fibrosis (1966-1997) categorized by time, design, and intervention. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000, 29:1-7.]. We maintain an ongoing register of all RCTs and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) in CF and have noted that in the five years since 1997 there has been a 48% increase in published trials. We aimed to assess whether this increase has been associated with an improvement in design quality. All RCTs and CCTs from 1961-2002 were assessed. Two epochs were then compared, 1961-1997 and 1998-2002. For each trial we recorded the design, participant numbers and the intervention studied. 261 trials in 1998-2002 were compared with 544 trials in 1961 - 1997. Comparing the two epochs a similar proportion of trials were parallel, double-blind and placebo controlled; also the median number of participants was similar. In the later epoch 25% of trials were multicentre, compared with 11% previously. Whilst this recent increase in clinical trials in CF is welcome, this has not been associated with improvements in quality. The trend for an increasing proportion of trials to be multicentre is encouraging. There are however, still deficiencies in the design of clinical trials in CF. (C) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Cystic Fibrosis Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 8
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Quality of full and final publications reporting acute stroke trials - A systematic review
    Bath, FJ
    Owen, VE
    Bath, PMW
    [J]. STROKE, 1998, 29 (10) : 2203 - 2210
  • [2] Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement
    Begg, C
    Cho, M
    Eastwood, S
    Horton, R
    Moher, D
    Olkin, I
    Pitkin, R
    Rennie, D
    Schulz, KF
    Simel, D
    Stroup, DF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08): : 637 - 639
  • [3] BRIGGS TA, 2004, J CYST FIBROS, V3, P238
  • [4] A review of randomised controlled trials published in Archives of Disease in Childhood from 1982-96
    Campbell, H
    Surry, SAM
    Royle, EM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1998, 79 (02) : 192 - 197
  • [5] A COHORT STUDY OF SUMMARY REPORTS OF CONTROLLED TRIALS
    CHALMERS, I
    ADAMS, M
    DICKERSIN, K
    HETHERINGTON, J
    TARNOWMORDI, W
    MEINERT, C
    TONASCIA, S
    CHALMERS, TC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10): : 1401 - 1405
  • [6] Cheng K, 2000, PEDIATR PULM, V29, P1
  • [7] GREENHALGH T, 1997, READ PAPER BASICS EV
  • [8] Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? The testing of healthcare interventions is evolving
    Haynes, B
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7211) : 652 - 653
  • [9] Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
    Jadad, AR
    Moore, RA
    Carroll, D
    Jenkinson, C
    Reynolds, DJM
    Gavaghan, DJ
    McQuay, HJ
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [10] Jadad AR., 1998, RANDOMISED CONTROLLE