Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach

被引:3
|
作者
Dagsuyu, Cansu [1 ]
Polat, Ulviye [2 ]
Kokangul, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Adana Alparslan Turkes Sci & Technol Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Adana, Turkey
[2] Namik Kemal Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Corlu, Tekirdag, Turkey
[3] Cukurova Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making; Quality control; Process capability; Process priority number (PPN); Immersion phosphating process;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-021-05681-w
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The surface protection processes are performed for metals in order to improve paint adhesion and dye yield, increase corrosion strength, and eliminate the necessity of re-processing. The desired quality to be received in the parts processed in the surface protection processes which constitutes multiple sub-processes can be obtained only if the sub-processes are conducted effectively. In this study, the criteria being effective on surface protection processes have been identified, and an approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the process capability (C-p) values have been developed in order to identify the significance level of these criteria on the surface quality. The approach developed has been applied to the immersion phosphating process of a large-scale company. First of all, the significant levels of sub-processes were identified through the AHP method based on the quality parameters followed by the company. Then the C-p values were calculated based on the measurement criteria in order to understand the competence of each sub-process. Important subprocesses affecting the final quality of the immersion phosphating process have been identified by means of the PPN (Process Priority Number) index developed by using the AHP results and C-p values.
引用
收藏
页码:7169 / 7180
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [2] Multi-criteria decision-making process for buildings
    Barcomb, JD
    Curtner, A
    35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2000, : 528 - 535
  • [3] An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Business Process Information Systems
    Kang, He-Yau
    Lee, Amy H., I
    Chan, Yao-Chuan
    MATHEMATICS, 2019, 7 (10)
  • [4] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [5] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [6] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421
  • [7] Happiness at work: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dahiya, Rinki
    Raghuvanshi, Juhi
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04) : 459 - 482
  • [8] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [9] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [10] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141