In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae

被引:131
作者
Gahlert, M. [1 ]
Roehling, S. [2 ,3 ]
Sprecher, C. M. [2 ]
Kniha, H. [1 ]
Milz, S. [2 ,4 ]
Bormann, K. [5 ]
机构
[1] Private Dent Clin, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[2] AO Fdn, AO Res Inst, Davos, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel, Univ Basel Hosp, Hightech Res Ctr, Dept Craniomaxillofacial Surg, Basel, Switzerland
[4] LMU Munchen, Anat Anstalt, Munich, Germany
[5] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-3000 Hannover, Germany
关键词
bone-implant contact; dental implants; histomorphometric analysis; osseointegration; zirconia implant; ORAL IMPLANTS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; ABUTMENTS; OXIDE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02157.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the bone tissue response to surface-modified zirconia (ZrO2) and titanium implants. Methods: Cylindrical low-pressure injection moulded zirconia (ZrO2) implants were produced with an acid-etched surface. Titanium implants with identical shape, sandblasted and acid-etched surface (SLA) served as controls. Eighteen adult miniature pigs received both implant types in the maxilla 6 months after extraction of the canines and incisors. The animals were euthanized after 4, 8 and 12 weeks and 16 zirconia and 18 titanium implants with the surrounding tissue were retrieved, embedded in methylmethacrylate and stained with Giemsa-Eosin. The stained sections were digitized and histomorphometrically analysed with regard to peri-implant bone density (bone volume/total volume) and bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney' U-test. Results: Histomorphometrical analysis showed direct osseous integration for both materials. ZrO2 implants revealed mean peri-implant bone density values of 60.4% (SD +/- 9.9) at 4 weeks, 65.4% (SD +/- 13.8) at 8 weeks, and 63.3% (SD +/- 21.5) at 12 weeks after implantation, whereas Ti-SLA implants demonstrated mean values of 61.1% (SD +/- 6.2), 63.6% (SD +/- 6.8) and 68.2% (SD +/- 5.8) at corresponding time intervals. Concerning the BIC ratio, the mean values for ZrO2 ranged between 67.1% (SD +/- 21.1) and 70% (SD +/- 14.5) and for Ti-SLA between 64.7% (SD +/- 9.4) and 83.7% (SD +/- 10.3). For the two parameters investigated, no significant differences between both types of implants could be detected at any time point. Conclusion: The results indicate that there was no difference in osseointegration between ZrO2 implants and Ti-SLA controls regarding peri-implant bone density and BIC ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 286
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: A clinical and histologic study [J].
Akagawa, Y ;
Hosokawa, R ;
Sato, Y ;
Kamayama, K .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 80 (05) :551-558
[2]   Fracture Strength of Zirconia Implants after Artificial Aging [J].
Andreiotelli, Marina ;
Kohal, Ralf-Joachim .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (02) :158-166
[3]   Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review [J].
Andreiotelli, Marina ;
Wenz, Hans J. ;
Kohal, Ralf-Joachim .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 :32-47
[4]   INFLUENCE OF SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS ON BONE INTEGRATION OF TITANIUM IMPLANTS - A HISTOMORPHOMETRIC STUDY IN MINIATURE PIGS [J].
BUSER, D ;
SCHENK, RK ;
STEINEMANN, S ;
FIORELLINI, JP ;
FOX, CH ;
STICH, H .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1991, 25 (07) :889-902
[5]   Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface [J].
Buser, D ;
Broggini, N ;
Wieland, M ;
Schenk, RK ;
Denzer, AJ ;
Cochran, DL ;
Hoffmann, B ;
Lussi, A ;
Steinemann, SG .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (07) :529-533
[6]   Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: An in vivo study [J].
Depprich R. ;
Zipprich H. ;
Ommerborn M. ;
Naujoks C. ;
Wiesmann H.-P. ;
Kiattavorncharoen S. ;
Lauer H.-C. ;
Meyer U. ;
Kübler N.R. ;
Handschel J. .
Head & Face Medicine, 4 (1)
[7]   Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs [J].
Gahlert, M. ;
Gudehus, T. ;
Eichhorn, S. ;
Steinhauser, E. ;
Kniha, H. ;
Erhardt, W. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (05) :662-668
[8]   Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs [J].
Gahlert, M. ;
Roehling, S. ;
Wieland, M. ;
Sprecher, C. M. ;
Kniha, H. ;
Milz, S. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (11) :1247-1253
[9]  
Glauser R, 2004, INT J PROSTHODONT, V17, P285
[10]   TISSUE COMPATIBILITY AND STABILITY OF A NEW ZIRCONIA CERAMIC INVIVO [J].
ICHIKAWA, Y ;
AKAGAWA, Y ;
NIKAI, H ;
TSURU, H .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (02) :322-326