Large deformation stress relaxation and compression-recovery of gluten representing different wheat classes

被引:11
作者
Chapman, Stephen J. [1 ]
Mulvaney, Steven J. [1 ]
Chinnaswamy, Rangan [2 ]
Rayas-Duarte, Patricia [3 ]
Allvin, Bo [4 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Food Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] USDA GIPSA, Natl Grain Ctr, Kansas City, MO 64153 USA
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Biochem & Mol Biol Dept, Robert M Kerr Food & Agr Prod Ctr, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[4] Perten Instruments AB, Huddinge, Sweden
关键词
Gluten; Large deformation; Bi-axial compression; Stress relaxation; RHEOLOGY; MACROPOLYMER; HYPOTHESIS; ELASTICITY; STRENGTH; DOUGHS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcs.2012.01.012
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Despite the great variety of physicochemical and rheological tests available for measuring wheat flour, dough and gluten quality, the US wheat marketing system still relies primarily on wheat kernel hardness and growing season to categorize cultivars. To better understand and differentiate wheat cultivars of the same class, the tensile strength, and stress relaxation behavior of gluten from 15 wheat cultivars was measured and compared to other available physicochemical parameters, including but not limited to protein content, glutenin macropolymer content (GMP) and bread loaf volume. In addition, a novel gluten compression relaxation (Gluten CORE) instrument was used to measure the degree of elastic recovery of gluten for 15 common US wheat cultivars. Gluten strength ranged from 0.04 to 0.43 N at 500% extension, while the degree of recovery ranged from 5 to 78%. Measuring gluten strength clearly differentiated cultivars within a wheat class: nonetheless it was not a good predictor of baking quality on its own in terms of bread volume. Gluten strength was highly correlated with mixograph mixing times (r = 0.879) and degree of recovery (r = 0.855), suggesting that dough development time was influenced by gluten strength and that the CORE instrument was a suitable alternative to tensile testing, since it is less time intensive and less laborious to use. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 372
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
AACCI, 2011, 263101 AACCI
[2]   On the elasticity of wheat gluten [J].
Belton, PS .
JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 1999, 29 (02) :103-107
[3]  
Chinnaswamy R., 2005, P 3 INT WHEAT QUAL C, P253
[4]   Comparison of predictions of baking volume using large deformation rheological properties [J].
Dobraszczyk, B. J. ;
Salmanowicz, B. P. .
JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2008, 47 (02) :292-301
[5]   Rheology and the breadmaking process [J].
Dobraszczyk, BJ ;
Morgenstern, M .
JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2003, 38 (03) :229-245
[6]   Heat stress and genotype affect the glutenin particles of the glutenin macropolymer-gel fraction [J].
Don, C ;
Lookhart, G ;
Naeem, H ;
MacRitchie, F ;
Hamer, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2005, 42 (01) :69-80
[7]   Glutenin macropolymer: a gel formed by glutenin particles [J].
Don, C ;
Lichtendonk, W ;
Plijter, JJ ;
Hamer, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2003, 37 (01) :1-7
[8]   GLUTENIN STRUCTURE [J].
EWART, JAD .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1979, 30 (05) :482-492
[9]   A HYPOTHESIS FOR STRUCTURE AND RHEOLOGY OF GLUTENIN [J].
EWART, JAD .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1968, 19 (11) :617-&