Can patients be trained to expect shared decision making in clinical consultations? Feasibility study of a public library program to raise patient awareness

被引:13
作者
Adisso, Evehouenou Lionel [1 ,2 ]
Borde, Valerie
Saint-Hilaire, Marie-Eve
Robitaille, Hubert [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Archambault, Patrick [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Blais, Johanne [4 ]
Cameron, Cynthia [4 ]
Cauchon, Michel [4 ]
Fleet, Richard [4 ]
Letourneau, Jean-Simon [4 ]
Labrecque, Michel [7 ,8 ]
Quinty, Julien [4 ]
Samson, Isabelle [4 ]
Boucher, Alexandrine [1 ,2 ]
Tchala, Herve
Zomahoun, Vignon [1 ,9 ]
Legare, France [1 ,2 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Tier Canada Res Chair Shared Decis Making & Knowl, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Laval CERSPUL, Ctr Rech Soins & Serv Premiere Ligne, Ctr Integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux CIUSSS Capi, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Bibliotheque Quebec, Quebec City Network Publ Lib, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Laval, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Laval, Div Crit Care Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Ctr Integre Sante & Serv Sociaux Chaudiere Appala, Site Hotel Dieu Levis, Levis, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Laval, Hop St Francois DAssise, CHU Quebec, Ctr Rech, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[8] Canadian Inst Hlth Res, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[9] Quebec SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
RESPONSE-SHIFT BIAS; HEALTH-CARE; PHYSICIANS; INVOLVE; YOUNGER; OLDER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0208449
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Shared decision making (SDM) is a process whereby decisions are made together by patients and/or families and clinicians. Nevertheless, few patients are aware of its proven benefits. This study investigated the feasibility, acceptability and impact of an intervention to raise public awareness of SDM in public libraries. Materials and methods A 1.5 hour interactive workshop to be presented in public libraries was co-designed with Quebec City public library network officials, a science communication specialist and physicians. A clinical topic of maximum reach was chosen: antibiotic overuse in treatment of acute respiratory tract infections. The workshop content was designed and a format, whereby a physician presents the information and the science communication specialist invites questions and participation, was devised. The event was advertised to the general public. An evaluation form was used to collect data on participants' sociodemographics, feasibility and acceptability components and assess a potential impact of the intervention. Facilitators held a post-workshop focus group to qualitatively assess feasibility, acceptability and impact. Results All 10 planned workshops were held. Out of 106 eligible public participants, 89 were included in the analysis. Most participants were women (77.6%), retired (46.1%) and over 45 (59.5%). Over 90% of participants considered the workshop content to be relevant, accessible, and clear. They reported substantial average knowledge gain about antibiotics (2.4, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.0-2.8; P<.001) and about SDM (4.0, 95% CI: 3.44.5; P<.001). Self-reported knowledge gain about SDM was significantly higher than about antibiotics (4.0 versus 2.4; P<.001). Knowledge gain did not vary by sociodemographic characteristics. The focus group confirmed feasibility and suggested improvements. Conclusions A public library intervention is feasible and effective way to increase public awareness of SDM and could be a new approach to implementing SDM by preparing potential patients to ask for it in the consulting room.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1908, BIOMETRIKA, V6, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]  
Baxter N, 2001, CAN MED ASSOC J, V164, P1837
[4]   Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: A mixed methods approach to message development [J].
Bell, Robert A. ;
Paterniti, Debora A. ;
Azari, Rahman ;
Duberstein, Paul R. ;
Epstein, Ronald M. ;
Rochlen, Aaron B. ;
Johnson, Megan Dwight ;
Orrange, Sharon E. ;
Slee, Christina ;
Kravitz, Richard L. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 78 (02) :198-205
[5]   How We Design Feasibility Studies [J].
Bowen, Deborah J. ;
Kreuter, Matthew ;
Spring, Bonnie ;
Cofta-Woerpel, Ludmila ;
Linnan, Laura ;
Weiner, Diane ;
Bakken, Suzanne ;
Kaplan, Cecilia Patrick ;
Squiers, Linda ;
Fabrizio, Cecilia ;
Fernandez, Maria .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 36 (05) :452-457
[6]  
Burkhard C, 2011, SHARED DECISION MAKI
[7]  
Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2017, ANT PRESCR MOR OFT C
[8]   Ageing populations: the challenges ahead [J].
Christensen, Kaare ;
Doblhammer, Gabriele ;
Rau, Roland ;
Vaupel, James W. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9696) :1196-1208
[9]   Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument [J].
Couet, Nicolas ;
Desroches, Sophie ;
Robitaille, Hubert ;
Vaillancourt, Hugues ;
Leblanc, Annie ;
Turcotte, Stephane ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Legare, France .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (04) :542-561
[10]   DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH-STATUS BETWEEN OLDER AND YOUNGER HOMELESS ADULTS [J].
GELBERG, L ;
LINN, LS ;
MAYEROAKES, SA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1990, 38 (11) :1220-1229